Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

--On Saturday, August 09, 2008 12:16 PM -0500 Robert Braver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While the ARF format allows for the inclusion of the entire message that is the subject of the complaint, AOL will be redacting the message. Perhaps the customized part of the message could include the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.2: automatic newaliases from GUI listcreation?

On Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:07 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This capability already exists for Postfix in Mailman 2.1. The same functionality can't be directly implemented for Sendmail because of sendmail's requirements for ownership and permissions of alias files, but

Re: [Mailman-Users] corporate spam filter operation

--On Friday, March 21, 2008 8:50 PM -0400 Matt Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there corporate, enterprise spam-killing services that work on a user-by-user basis, rather than a message-by-message basis? For example, where the same message, sent to a few different people, might be

Re: [Mailman-Users] word bounces in from address

--On Monday, March 17, 2008 1:20 PM -0400 Nick L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that there is a workaround to remove the word 'bounces in the from heading. Just curious, why would someone want to remove bounces? Is it a swear word in some languages?

Re: [Mailman-Users] word bounces in from address

--On Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:40 AM -0700 Dragon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's also limited to particular versions of Microsoft Outlook The most recent version? If not, one can simply say upgrade your client. Either by going to the expensive one or switching to a free one. (I *am*

[Mailman-Users] Spam backscatter: Which aliases to remove

I want to remove aliases from my mailman installation to avoid spam backscatter. Which aliases do I absolutely need? Here's a list from mm-handler: @ValidActions = qw(admin bounces confirm join leave owner request subscribe unsubscribe);

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spam backscatter: Which aliases to remove

--On Monday, March 17, 2008 6:53 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 'join' and 'leave' are synonyms for 'subscribe' and 'unsubscribe'. Jo Rhett would say you don't need any of these because nearly everyone uses the web. He might also say you don't need/want 'request' and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Personalising Content

--On Monday, March 17, 2008 5:33 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In addition, Mailman can personalize the To: header of the message. See http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq03.015.htp for information about personalization options. The use of the subject

Re: [Mailman-Users] minimizing spam addresses on web site

--On Monday, March 10, 2008 9:23 AM -0400 Chuck Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A couple days ago I saw a post on the dev list about backscatter spam and also found a thread about someone's attempt at changing the -owner address, that didn't appear to be successful. That and the further

Re: [Mailman-Users] Archives, the Forbidden Zone

--On Sunday, November 21, 2004 12:11 AM -0800 Nathan Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have found nothing that can explain why I continue to see the 403 Forbidden error. Anything interesting in /var/log/httpd or /var/log/messages? Alias /pipermail/ /var/lib/mailman/archives/public/ Are there

Re: [Mailman-Users] Archives, the Forbidden Zone

--On Sunday, November 21, 2004 8:25 AM -0800 Nathan Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So does anyone understand the audit error messages? I suppose that has something to do with SELinux being enabled on this system, but I know next to nothing about it. That'd be my guess. You could try asking on

RE: [Mailman-Users] Has anyone successfully installed Mailman

--On Saturday, November 20, 2004 7:11 AM -0500 Matthew Saltzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you can't install the source RPM for rebuilding without the python-devel 2.2 package. Quibble: You can't *build* the source RPM without the devel package. You can install it, which basically amounts to

RE: [Mailman-Users] Has anyone successfully installed Mailman

--On Saturday, November 20, 2004 10:08 AM -0800 greg deputy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm relatively new to linux, and I've found some things are easier installed as a package and others from source. This is just my personal perception, of course. I generally try to install from source first, I

RE: [Mailman-Users] Has anyone successfully installed Mailman

--On Saturday, November 20, 2004 9:45 PM -0500 Matthew Saltzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Haven't actually tried it, but won't rpm complain about the missing python-devel package when you attempt to install the SRPM? Seems like that would be what dependencies in SRPMs are for. No, build

Re: [Mailman-Users] Has anyone successfully installed Mailman on Fedora Core 2?

--On Thursday, November 18, 2004 10:40 PM -0800 Greg Deputy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone successfully installed Mailman on Fedora Core 2? I've been trying on and off for the last few weeks, without success. Looking through the mailling list archives I've seen several threads on problems

Re: [Mailman-Users] Will MailMan do all this?

--On Wednesday, November 10, 2004 2:49 PM + Clare Redstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can MailMan do this and can a novice set it up? It lacks the search feature. I believe everything else is there. What's a novice? Depends on how well he can follow the written instructions.

[Mailman-Users] Administrivia boilerplate

Does anyone have some good boilerplate to use in a welcome message or a periodic reminder to cover some of the common newbie mistakes? I'm thinking of issues like hijacking threads, which a lot of new list users don't understand, and use of the List-Id header for filtering. (Esp. for Outlook

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spoofed Addresses

--On Friday, October 29, 2004 5:33 PM -0400 David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The other one spoofed a valid subscriber's address, so mailman accepted it and sent copies to all subscribers. How do you know it's spoofed? How would mailman know?

Re: [Mailman-Users] Spoofed Addresses

--On Friday, October 29, 2004 8:24 PM -0400 David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Part of asking the question was to learn whether mailman has any ability to verify addresses I expect the biggest problem to be mobile users who post from multiple IP addresses. I'm somewhat bleeding edge ;) for

[Mailman-Users] per-user subject prefix

Is there a way to enable/disable subject prefix (like the [mailman-users] on this list) on a per-user basis? I like NOT having the prefix, as it reduces the available space for content in the subject. But I get users using web-based mail readers and those who can't use their client's filters

[Mailman-Users] -1 Mailman moderator request(s) waiting

I keep getting -1 Mailman moderator request(s) waiting from the lists I've just created on a fresh 2.1.5 installation on Fedora Core 2. Any idea what these mean? (I've dealt with moderator requests before on a 2.0 installation. I've just never seen the -1 before.)

Re: [Mailman-Users] -1 Mailman moderator request(s) waiting

--On Thursday, October 14, 2004 10:13 AM -0700 K. Clair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/2004-August/017120.html Thanks and Doh! Somehow I missed that when searching Gmane. -- Mailman-Users mailing

Re: [Mailman-Users] -1 Mailman moderator request(s) waiting

Hmm, the item in the FAQ doesn't apply, as the request.pck is there for my 3 lists. But I've only received one of these notifications for each list, so perhaps it fixes itself after one occurrence. -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL