On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:10:53AM -0500, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
On 8/28/2015 3:03 AM, Will Yardley wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:37:18PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mark writes:
First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a
number of mailman lists on a Centos
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:37:18PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mark writes:
First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a number
of mailman lists on a Centos 6 platform and mailman 2.1.12-25. This
version was updated in July as follows:
ps - Here are a couple of quick throwaway 'withlist' scripts I threw
together to add a regexp matching the spammers' email addresses, and to
purge pending subscription requests matching a similar regexp. Posting
here in case someone finds them useful for this, or some other, purpose.
% cat
I'm seeing massive numbers of subscription lists to various lists we
host (including multiple requests to the same list).
These are submitted via a distributed network of hosts, presumably
botnet victims / open proxies.
The requests are from
foo+[0-9]{9}@gmail.com
e.g.,
foo+55216394@
where
And, self-followup, I had looked on list.org before, but hadn't checked
the archives, so seems clear that the behavior is common. Running the
RHEL5 Mailman currently (2.1.9) so still don't have the
SUBSCRIBE_FORM_SECRET feature yet.
Mostly curious about the motivation behind this - what do these
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 03:32:04PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mark Sapiro writes:
On August 24, 2015 12:44:02 PM PDT, Nina Nicholson
nnichol...@dioceseofnewark.org wrote:
Andrew - I am using Plesk, and Mailman does interface with it.
According to the FAQ at
I found some .psv files in /var/spool/mailman/in/ (RHEL 5 Mailman
package; 2.1.9). That seems to be too early for the stuff mentioned here
(and I don't see those options in Defaults.py)
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2009-June/066395.html
Is it safe to remove old .psv files in
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 04:55:52PM -0700, Peter Knowles wrote:
What is the best way to deal with feedback loop messages where the provider
has redacted the email address of the party who filed the complaint?
I haven't looked at a FBL message for a while, but most of the ones I've
seen didn't
Looking at the code, I think I know the answer already, but is there any
way (with Mailman 2.1.9) to send a notification to the list owner when a
list is created, but do it in non-interactive mode?
Right now, you have to use '-q' to avoid hitting enter, but then no
notification to the list-owner
It seems someone is trying to forge-subscribe certain addresses (mostly
AOL / Yahoo / Gmail etc. addresses) on our Mailman install.
For example, (slightly sanitized, though the IP address is the real one):
[19/Jul/2013:09:49:17 -0700] 137.117.103.83 TLSv1 RC4-SHA GET
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:31:03PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Will Yardley mail...@veggiechinese.net:
It seems someone is trying to forge-subscribe certain addresses (mostly
AOL / Yahoo / Gmail etc. addresses) on our Mailman install.
Which version of mailman is that?
2.1.9. And yes
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:03:32PM -0200, Rodrigo Abrantes Antunes wrote:
In my case, I found that the return-path header is the address of the
original sender, so how could I add a rule in mailman to deny posts with
return-path's address that are not members?
The envelope-sender can also be
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 06:39:06PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:51:51 -0400 Brian Canty bca...@apsa.org wrote:
Hello - I was wondering if anyone has a way to provide subscribers a
simple and easy way to unsubscribe from a mailing list. I do not
What's wrong with the
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:58:46PM -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
I have no idea why AOL wants to make it difficult for list
administrators to unsubscribe people who don't want to be subscribed
and who complain to AOL about list posts being spam.
To prevent listwashing or retaliation, for one
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:51:54PM +0200, Leo Hackstein wrote:
On 27/03/2012 21:19, Mark Sapiro wrote:
See the latter portion of the FAQ at http://wiki.list.org/x/uIA9.
Thank you very much, haven't seen that before. Using wget sounds a bit
counterintuitive, but it seems to work.
You can do
Does Mailman base64 decode the subject before applying a regex, and if
so, can I use UTF-8 character names in the regex to match various
types of 8-bit characters?
Say, for example, that I want to block messages with 电话卡 somewhere
in the subject line.
Obviously, the actual raw Subject header
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:54:42PM -0400, Jack Barnes wrote:
We want to have users subscribe to a list but we don't want to require
approval or confirmation. Under privacy options there isn't an option for
this. These lists are outgoing only for the most part, and these are lists
for school
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:43:15PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
William Yardley wrote:
Also, is it possible to toggle personalization under the hood (using
withlist / config_list to set 'mlist.personalize = 2') /without/
enabling OWNERS_CAN_ENABLE_PERSONALIZATION globally? I have a case where
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:07:41PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
For example, you *could* put the following in msg_footer. This is
*definitely not recommended* because despite the warning, users will
leave this in replies and forwards, but ...
Thanks. In this case, it's exactly what I want,
http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030545 seems to
suggest that it's possible to enable personalization (for headers /
footers of messages), without enabling VERP itself (for the
envelope-sender of messages).
Is that correct? Some of the mailing list messages I have seen seem to
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:14:02AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Brandon Sussman writes:
I have had good luck so far with Dreamhost's Mailman support - they
have some folks who seem to care and know Mailman fairly well.
That's interesting, considering that there was some hair-pulling
So I had a list configuration get hosed recently, and unfortunately, my
only backups were from after the configuration got hosed.
Fortunately, I had a Mailman subscription log dating back to before the
list was created, so I decided to throw together a little script to
rebuild the subscriber
Ok - so the attachment got stripped.
Anyway, it's up at:
http://veggiechinese.net/rebuild_subscriber_list.txt
w
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:23:08PM +, Jon Loose wrote:
I have just set up a new mailman list, which is working well. Thanks
to the developers for this software. Very useful indeed.
On looking at the downloadable archives, the message ids are very long
indeed (over 100 characters). I
I've occasionally seen an issue where Mailman seems to randomly discard
messages.
I don't think the sender canceled via the web, because there's no:
Reason: Sender discarded message via web. in the log, and I don't see
anything in my web access logs from around then.
I approved the message via
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:27:59PM -0500, Dan Phillips wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 7:25 PM, William Yardley wrote:
[ CCing the list too, in case it's useful to anyone)
Any ideas?
Do you have content filtering set to remove html? If the message was
a single part text/html and html
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:46:03PM -0400, Larry Johnson wrote:
In the meantime we're having serious space issues with the current
machine, and I have a question about the way the messages are stored
here. In the archive directories under the list name messages seem to
be stored in three
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 02:07:45PM -0500, Barry Finkel wrote:
We have a number of non-subscription lists - the e-mail lists are
re-generated each evening from an external database. The persons on
each re-generated list have no say as to their subscriptions to the
list.
With majordomo, we
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:35:48PM -0400, Bill Howe wrote:
Is there a way to edit a portion of a message on the archive? a subscriber
accidently included some language she would like vedited out.
See http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/faq.html
Q. I want to get rid of some messages in my
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:11:32AM -0400, Marty Beilin wrote:
We are a small non-profit organization. We send out a few email
announcements each month using Mailman residing at our website hosting
service. We are moving our website to another hosting service that
does not offer mass
In case it's helpful to anyone, I put the first draft of a little script
for mutt to simplify moderation tasks. Feedback welcome. Thought I'd
post here in case it's useful to anyone.
http://veggiechinese.net/mutt_mailman_approve.txt
It's a perl script; it requires File::Copy, File::Temp and
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:41:16PM +0900, Jim Tittsler wrote:
On Sep 30, 2004, at 03:16, Will Yardley wrote:
Anything further I can do to debug this? Any idea what the
MemoryError refers to?
How large are your archives?
The mbox file is about 55M
The whole indexed archive directory
I got the following error when rebuilding archives for a
list (OpenBSD Mailman 2.1.5 installed from OpenBSD ports. It
turned out the actual problem was a permissions problem on
/var/spool/mailman/lists/[listname] (it was owned by root:_mailman
instead of _mailman:_mailman). Should I file a bug
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:25:37AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
Should I file a bug about this (that the error isn't more specific)?
It would be much more helpful if this said Cannot write to
/var/spool/mailman/lists/nord-modular or something rather than
MemoryError.
Eep. I take that back
So I installed Mailman from ports on OpenBSD 3.5, and added the
following to mm_cfg.py after from Defaults import *
DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'mailman.code404.com'
DEFAULT_URL_HOST = 'mailman.code404.com'
add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)
yet messages that are sent out still
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 10:18:55AM +0900, Jim Tittsler wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 04:57:50PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)
yet messages that are sent out still reference localhost.my.domain.
Did you create the list(s) before
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 12:19:12PM +0200, Thomas Hochstein wrote:
John S. Strock schrieb:
How do I remove the On behalf of in the 'From' field?
There *is* no on behalf of in the Fom:-field. You just have to use a
client that does not show it that way.
This is just the way some versions
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 01:34:51PM -0400, PC Specialties Inc wrote:
Has anyone thought of numbering the attachments so they match the topic list ?
--
Since when is skepticism un-American?
Dissent's not treason but they talk like it's the same...
(Sleater-Kinney - Combat Rock)
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 03:43:05PM -0500, jsingh wrote:
When I send an attachement, why does the footer come as an attachement if I
use rich text or html format? what do I need to do for the footer to appear
normally at the end of the body of the message rather than as an
attachement.
I'm
I've been seeing some weird hangs with Mailman in the last few
days. We have a large number of lists, running 2.1.4 w/ htdig patches.
This is a system that's been running with no problems for quite a while
(without any major changes that I'm aware of).
In most cases, removing all lockfiles other
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:45:16PM -0800, Mark Dadgar wrote:
On Feb 5, 2004, at 2:34 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
I can go back through the 90's, into the mid-80's if length of time
is the important criteria here. I have multiple gigabytes of e-mail
on my current system, and untold
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:19:58AM -0600, Michael Halcrow wrote:
Hi. My team would like to run a mailing list with another team
external to the company, but verything needs to be GnuPG encrypted.
Those who post to the mailing list must encrypt it with the mailing
list account's public key,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 05:16:08PM -0800, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
On Monday 05 January 2004 14:27, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
Installed 2.1.2 on Mandrake 9.1 with postfix 20031231. Install was
by rpm from the mandrake site. Followed the readme.postfix. Got
the web interface up and running
Still haven't gotten a response on this, other than the fact that other
people have noticed the same thing (wrote to the list about it a long
time back).
When mailmanctl is run with -s (supposedly kills stale locks), Mailman
spits out the default usage summary, and then No command given.. Same
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:16:04PM -0500, Todd wrote:
Will Yardley wrote:
When mailmanctl is run with -s (supposedly kills stale locks),
Mailman spits out the default usage summary, and then No command
given.. Same with --stale-lock-cleanup. This command also fails
to clean up stale
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:39:24PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do most folks do so that Mailman will restart when the system is
restarted uncleanly? Could having the system's startup script (assuming
a FreeBSD style or SysV style startup script
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:03:29AM -0800, Will Froning wrote:
I have Mailman 2.1.1 w/ htDig running on FreeBSD 4.8. I have a
particular user (read CIO) that never uses the Enter key when composing
messages. So besides making the archive just plain ugly with these
infinitely long lines, his
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:33:57PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
Ricardo Kustner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So my current situation is that my ISP is risking to get blacklisted and
I can't do anything about it except for shutting down the lists or
remove block all AOL users :(
Yes, they
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:36:58AM -0800, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
On Nov 4, 2003, at 8:54 AM, Ricardo Kustner wrote:
I wish I could do that: my current mailman setup doesn't put the
user's address in the To: address and since those wonderful AOL
reports only include the original
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:55:43AM -0800, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
On Nov 4, 2003, at 10:52 AM, Will Yardley wrote:
Do we *really* need this feature on the mailman-users list? Does
anyone actually find it helpful?
god, yes. Please don't assume everyone on your lists is a geek with
perfect
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:59:33PM -0600, McKeever Chris wrote:
I have noticed that the threading on our archive does not work,
looking through the Mailman Faq/Archive, I have learned that this is
typically caused by the In-Reply-To not being supported via the Mail
Client. Looking at the
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:54:58PM -0500, Pascal Blanchette wrote:
I was wondering if there was a reason why the only Mailman version available
as a stable debian package is version 2.0.11?
Version 2.1.3 is marked as unstable. Is the new version still in beta or is
it ready to be deployed
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 03:50:59PM -0600, Dale schibbelhut wrote:
My current hosting company does not want Mailman on their servers.
Other than that I am quite satisfied with their service. I am looking
for a company that will host lists using mailman software. Does
anybody have any
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:07:20PM -0700, Mike Chambers wrote:
I just set up mailman-2.1-8. Everything is working fine except it adds
[spam] to every single message to the list.
I have looked through the admin, and the docs and cannot figure out how to
prevent this. Any suggestions?
Is the
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:06:45PM -0700, Mike Chambers wrote:
No. It is not spam (I double checked that).
So the subject looks like this:
[spam][listname]subject here
More than likely, then, this is due to a spam filter that has nothing to
do with Mailman. Are you sure that such a spam
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:31:02AM -0400, Sean wrote:
You're best bet is to have your AOL users complain to AOL directly
about not getting their mail. I've been dealing with this for two
years and have got nowhere contact AOL.
Their postmaster and anti-spam departments have gotten a lot more
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:25:00PM +, Hostmaster wrote:
On our maiden voyage, we were mass subscribing to our list when we
realized it was sending the subscription message for each address. We
decided we did not want this, so we stopped the MTA. Now, we have
lots of unsent messages in
Is there an option to disable mass-subscription from the web interface,
so that users can't add non-confirmed addresses themselves?
Is there an option to require re-confirmation for addresses added (I
guess only allowing invite but not subscribe would take care of
this.
Lastly, is there a way to
Is it possible to change the public email address of a list (that
reported in the rfc2369 headers, message footers, etc.) while
maintaining a different name internally? Would there be any obvious
problems I'm missing with such a feature?
For our virtually hosted lists, we need independent
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:07:54PM -0400, Jon Carnes wrote:
This would be a fairly simple hack to the source. You would simply grep
for the option you want to comment out and when you find it in the
source, comment it out. Then it won't appear in the web pages (that
would be for every
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:04:19PM -0400, Rob Carlson wrote:
My list owners are getting Sobig files bounced to them through the
administrative addresses. One of their ISPs has decided to reject
those relayed messages with a 550 User Unknown because they contain
Sobig. The mailman-owner gets
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:05:51PM -0400, Rob Carlson wrote:
On Tuesday, Sep 2, 2003, at 19:59 US/Eastern, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
My list owners are getting Sobig files bounced to them through the
administrative addresses. One of their ISPs has decided to reject
those relayed messages
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:00:53PM -0700, jsmith wrote:
[ Two layers of miserable Lookout! TOFU corrected ]
My Footers are being sent to our mailing list participants as
Attachments rather than being inserted into the message text.
Please advise what I setup incorrectly and what I
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:43:54PM -0400, Raymond Wood wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:13:10AM +0200, Brad Knowles imagined:
For smaller sites, or sites wishing to have a simpler
configuration file, I find that postfix generally works very well.
It has one of the simplest configuration
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:58:22PM -0700, jsmith wrote:
[ Stop top posting! ]
If you've really tried sending mail from all these other mailers, why
does THIS message have the footer as part of the message body and not as
an attachment?
I have asked that question so many times here and get
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 06:19:38PM -0400, Clay Stuckey wrote:
Is there a way to allow posts from all non members? I have 20 or so lists
for my company. I want to allow anyone to email any list even it they are
not a member. I am using this purely as a centrally managed group email
solution.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 06:19:38PM -0400, Clay Stuckey wrote:
Is there a way to allow posts from all non members? I have 20 or so lists
for my company. I want to allow anyone to email any list even it they are
not a member. I am using this purely as a centrally managed group email
solution.
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 07:51:44PM -0700, SysAdmin wrote:
I've had nothing but problems with it. Majordomo sucked, but at least it
stayed up and running.
So don't use it.
--
Since when is skepticism un-American?
Dissent's not treason but they talk like it's the same...
(Sleater-Kinney -
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 03:56:59PM -0700, Roy Santos wrote:
I have seen a few postings regarding problems getting
flat threads while posting using Outlook clients. See
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03011.html.
But what I haven't seen is an answer on how or what
needs
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:10:20AM +0200, Amardeo Sarma wrote:
I am a newbie and running Mailman 2.1.1 on FreeBSD 4.7 / VPSv2, which works
with the old technique of running qrunner every minute from cron. The INSTALL
instructions give some hints on how to start the qrunner daemon at startup
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:59:04AM +1000, Peter Russell wrote:
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee (or responsible for delivery of the message to
the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such
a case,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:41:57PM -0700, Karen G. Schneider wrote:
However, at present Dreamhost is using Mailman 2.0.13, and there
are several must-have features I need for two large lists I manage
(5,000 and 16,000 subscribers). The last time I checked, they were
testing 2.1 but hadn't
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:30:16AM +0400, Moscow School of Human Rights wrote:
In my opinion the only and very important trait of Mailman is
impossibility to moderate the lists in Majordomo style, by adding
approved: password line at the top of technical e-mail message and
then sending it to
I wrote earlier about some suggested improvements with the confirmation
by mail function.
Here's another thing - if you insert an 'Approved: ' string that's
incorrect, the message is deleted (in a way that's unrecoverable,
AFAICT). My suggestion is that you get an error message back instead,
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 01:34:02AM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
In DNS you would have something like:
lists.mlsnet.com.A 216.216.23.43
MX 10 lists.mlsnet.com
MX 100 mail.mlsnet.com
In this scenario all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 03:57:47PM -0500, Sullivan, John wrote:
OK - But how do I get lists.mlsnet.com to relay mail to the mlsnet.com
mail server. Subcribers from the mlsnet.com domain are not receiving
any news letters sent out from the lists.mlsnet.com server. I am
getting a connection
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:10:59PM -0500, Sullivan, John wrote:
Here is a chunk of the maillog file.
Mar 31 12:01:57 localhost sendmail[780]: h2SKs2Rg011995:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], delay=2+20:07:55, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp,
pri=6439538, relay=mail.majorleaguesoccer.com.,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:38:15PM -0500, Sullivan, John wrote:
Ahh that's my problem - I can NOT connect to port 25.
Can someone help me out with trying to get that working? My deadline is
quickly approaching and I am nervous.
It sounds from your original message like you're using Red
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:47:24PM -0500, Erez Zadok wrote:
Is there a way that Mailman can remove certain headers before a
message is posted to a list? In particular, I want to remove the
Importance header, which some posters will set to high or
urgent unnecessarily. Some MUAs do all kinds
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 01:09:24AM -0500, Duke wrote:
I recently installed Mailman, replacing Majordomo, and I just used the
mass subscription feature and fed it my Majordomo subscriber lists. I'm
wondering what, if any, my subscribers' initial passwords are, or how I
could set them.
I
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:21:45PM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 15:48, Mark McEahern wrote:
3. Is there any reason to display this site-wide list in the list of lists
displayed by listinfo?
No. This should always be a private list.
I was wondering about this - the
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:02:45PM -0800, Staven Bruce wrote:
We are using Mailman 2.0.13 with Sendmail 8.12 on a RedHat Linux 8.0 system.
We send 'Word' and '.pdf' documents once a month or so to our mailing list.
Is there a way for these files to be retained as separate attachments in
A couple other feature requests
1) A setting which lets people confirm their own messages (as with TMDA)
- this way lists can stay open but still require some sort of
confirmation before letting a message through.
2) The response from email confirmation is the same, whether or not the
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:26:30PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:41:53 -0800
Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple other feature requests 1) A setting which lets people
confirm their own messages (as with TMDA) - this way lists can stay
open but still
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 07:42:44PM -0900, Andy Firman wrote:
Couple of quick questions to the Mailman gurus.
And I apologize in advance if this is not appropriate for this list.
I think almost all of your problems will be fixed if you upgrade to
Mailman v 2.1.1.
--
Since when is skepticism
It seems like it would be nice to setup a method of confirmation for
*approving* messages that uses a unique token instead of the list
password; while (hopefully) in most cases, the moderator will be sending
approval messages over SSL or from the same machine the list is on, it
seems like a bad
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 09:14:05AM +, Simon White wrote:
29-Jan-03 at 13:37, Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
If you have an old cookie from Mailman 2.0.x, you'll have to re-login
for every page until you manually clear the cookie from your browser
(after upgrading to 2.1
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 05:06:22PM +, Simon White wrote:
29-Jan-03 at 09:32, Abbo Peterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Before I consider Mailman as a newsletter mail list solution, I have a
few questions. I hope you have time to answer them...
I hope the 'Pre-sales' part is a joke...
Since upgrading to 2.1, I notice that instead of:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Realname [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Q. Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The headers appear as:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Realname [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Q. Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this
assuming that your nfs server
and kernel deal with locking properly, but I don't know how much risk
there would be with this method.
--
Will Yardley
input: william @ hq . newdream . net .
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
better, but we all know how likely that is to happen.
--
Will Yardley
input: william @ hq . newdream . net .
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org
to word wrap at
sending time because so many brain-damaged message viewers are out
there. But it is still a messy and hopefully short-lived kludge.
Well the convention is still to use the lowest common denominator and
wrap at 80 characters (generally 72-74).
--
Will Yardley
input: william
of qmail, although I've used it in the past. See
http://lifewithoutqmail.org/.
Exim would also be worth looking into.
--
Will Yardley
input: william @ hq . newdream . net .
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
itself can solve.
v2.1 authenticates on envelope as well.
Does it do this by default? This sounds like a bad idea as forging the
envelope-sender is pretty trivial (and common), and there's no reason
that the envelope-sender needs to match the 'From:' header.
--
Will Yardley
input: william
confirm the subscription; otherwise anyone
can subscribe anyone else to your list.
This is known as confirmed opt-in, and if you don't use a system like
this, you're very likely to get booted by your ISP for spamming.
--
Will Yardley
input: william @ hq . newdream . net
: XX at code404 dot com (Will Yardley)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: confirm 8a73a2be104ba0be21f1516299b4d8f3d00b4483
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Status: RO
Content-Length: 443
Lines
Elisha Wong wrote:
Just wonder if I get a text file of all the members of a list
I could not find any options in the web interface
$mailman_base/bin/list_members
--
Will Yardley
input: william @ hq . newdream . net .
--
Mailman-Users
Patrick Hsieh wrote:
Is there any way to configure mailman to convert HTML mail to plain text
format before delivery? If not, is there any patch available?
See the FAQ.
Either use the beta version or pipe mail through demime or stripmime
first.
--
Will Yardley
input: william @ hq
version from the
Mailman site - is this intentional? Even if I go to the specific site
for the beta version, the only links I can find are to the sourceforge
page (where I was able to download the beta), or the link to the stable
version.
--
Will Yardley
input: william @ hq . newdream . net
(clearsigned) messages.
I believe this is probably the behavior you want.
Given the fact that most MUAs do not support PGP/MIME and many can't
read PGP/MIME messages at all, I don't think that demiming this type of
attachment is a bad idea at all.
--
Will Yardley
input: william @ hq . newdream
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
