Glenn Sieb wrote:
Mark Sapiro said the following on 8/12/09 10:05 AM:
As Terry suggests, you could run bin/cleanarch as an additional
test/correction on the listname.mbox. There may be unescaped From
in message bodies that didn't confuse Mutt or that you didn't notice
with Mutt, and then
Glenn Sieb wrote:
I'm running mailman-2.1.12, with the htdig patches on FreeBSD 7.0
I have a list with archives that are about 10 years old. The archive
mbox size is 175M.
I was alerted by a subscriber that the August 2009 archives list 128 No
subject emails that look funny.
So I looked.. sure
Mark Sapiro said the following on 8/12/09 10:05 AM:
Do you see these Dec. 1999 messages when you look with Mutt?
*doublechecking* Yes. They look fine.
It looks like someone or some script ran bin/arch on Mon Aug 10
18:53:40 EDT 2009 (and possibly at other times) with some spurious
input,
Hullo,
I'm running mailman-2.1.12, with the htdig patches on FreeBSD 7.0
I have a list with archives that are about 10 years old. The archive
mbox size is 175M.
I was alerted by a subscriber that the August 2009 archives list 128 No
subject emails that look funny.
So I looked.. sure enough
Glenn Sieb wrote:
I have a list with archives that are about 10 years old. The archive
mbox size is 175M.
I was alerted by a subscriber that the August 2009 archives list 128 No
subject emails that look funny.
[snip]
From: redacted redacted_at...
To: redacted
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 23:27:19
