Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-10-05 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Brad == Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brad Well, by default, it doesn't ignore or hide the List-* Brad headers, and turns them into proper clickable links. [...] Brad This is all that needs to be done to properly Brad implement the RFC. If you think that's

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-10-05 Thread Brad Knowles
At 4:58 PM +0900 2004-10-05, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: The rest of the time, it's trivial to format them as a pulldown or popup menu. You mean that you think they're going to understand or remember how to use a pulldown or popup menu? For the class of luser

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-10-04 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
demo == demo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: demo I am not a coder and so cannot help I am afraid but may be demo an upgrade would be to autogenerate an email with a series demo of clickable links that generate emails that work with the demo given addresses. demo ... with

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-10-04 Thread John W. Baxter
On 10/4/2004 1:16, Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only disadvantage to this approach is that it requires cooperation from the large MUA vendors like Microsoft and Qualcomm, and the users know they're far more likely to get sympathy and timely action, at no cost in money or

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-10-04 Thread Brad Knowles
At 10:24 AM -0700 2004-10-04, John W. Baxter wrote: Now look at Qualcom's MUA products and their implementation of the RFC. This appears to be low priority, in that Eudora 5 and 6 have emerged since the RFC. Qualcomm does just fine in this respect. Qualcomm is not the problem. Microsoft is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-10-04 Thread John W. Baxter
On 10/4/2004 14:04, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 10:24 AM -0700 2004-10-04, John W. Baxter wrote: Now look at Qualcom's MUA products and their implementation of the RFC. This appears to be low priority, in that Eudora 5 and 6 have emerged since the RFC. Qualcomm does just

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-10-04 Thread Brad Knowles
At 5:17 PM -0700 2004-10-04, John W. Baxter wrote: OK, so what does Eudora do to make the RFC 2919 headers useful? All I think it does out of the box is not filter any of them in its presentation of a message, leading to endless complaints about those headers and being the prime trigger for

[Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-09-25 Thread demo
Hi Just some humble feedback on the response message; This is one area where I find users fall over and die and the complexity of the response and don't know what to do. [ And it is usually normal users that are trying to use it to unsubscribe ]. It is very techie. Little things might help,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-09-25 Thread Brad Knowles
At 12:27 PM +0100 2004-09-25, demo wrote: I am not a coder and so cannot help I am afraid but may be an upgrade would be to autogenerate an email with a series of clickable links that generate emails that work with the given addresses. Mailman is an open source project, and we would welcome

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-09-25 Thread Mark Sapiro
demo wrote: Just some humble feedback on the response message; This is one area where I find users fall over and die and the complexity of the response and don't know what to do. [ And it is usually normal users that are trying to use it to unsubscribe ]. It is very techie. Little things might

Re: [Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade

2004-09-25 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mark Sapiro wrote: One reason these are templates is to enable site specific changes to meet site needs. You can edit these templates and a future update will not overlay your changes. Clarification: The last sentence above applies if you are upgrading from source. I have no idea what will