[Mailman-Users] Fwd: Message Unparsable

2005-07-12 Thread Dennis Putnam
I am reposting this previously unanswered request for help to the list again as I am desperate to get this resolved. Surely there is someone out there with sufficient MIME expertise to help me. I am unable to find any MIME specific forms elsewhere. I should note that sending the MIME

Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: Message Unparsable

2005-07-12 Thread Brad Knowles
At 9:08 AM -0400 2005-07-12, Dennis Putnam wrote: I am reposting this previously unanswered request for help to the list again as I am desperate to get this resolved. Surely there is someone out there with sufficient MIME expertise to help me. If you want help in figuring out MIME

Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: Message Unparsable

2005-07-12 Thread Dennis Putnam
DOH! No, I did not see that reply. Thanks. I wonder why it worked OK without going through Mailman? On Jul 12, 2005, at 9:18 AM, Schmitt, Gordon A. wrote: I thought I did see someone respond to you and maybe it wasn't the correct answer but they said that you  have the word boundary

Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: Message Unparsable

2005-07-12 Thread Dennis Putnam
Changing the correct spelling of boundary to the incorrect spelling that MIME wants (whose idea was that anyway) didn't help. Same error. Are there any other correct spellings that need to be made incorrect? :-) On Jul 12, 2005, at 9:18 AM, Schmitt, Gordon A. wrote: I thought I did see

Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: Message Unparsable

2005-07-12 Thread Dennis Putnam
Wait a minute. How stupid of me. The incorrect spelling (boundry) is what is wrong not the correct spelling (boundary). Sheesh. Its a pain getting old. Sorry to all. On Jul 12, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Dennis Putnam wrote: Changing the correct spelling of boundary to the incorrect spelling that