On 10/30/2016 05:04 AM, Mustafa Akgul wrote:
> there is nothing im Mailman error lohg. same ith qrunner.
If there is truly nothing in Mailman's qrunner log, either you are not
looking at the right logs or the logs have been rotated and the relevant
information is in an older log or gone.
>
>On 10/27/2016 10:17 AM, Mustafa Akgul wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> I have debain 7.11 , mailman 2.1.5-1 i386
>> I have a few lists. All stopped archiving.
>> LISTNAME.mbox is not updateing
>> I have run chech_perms -f as root. /usr/lib/mailman permissions are OK, and
>> permissions of non-links
On 10/27/2016 10:17 AM, Mustafa Akgul wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have debain 7.11 , mailman 2.1.5-1 i386
> I have a few lists. All stopped archiving.
> LISTNAME.mbox is not updateing
> I have run chech_perms -f as root. /usr/lib/mailman permissions are OK, and
> permissions of non-links ar OK.
Hello,
I have debain 7.11 , mailman 2.1.5-1 i386
I have a few lists. All stopped archiving.
LISTNAME.mbox is not updateing
I have run chech_perms -f as root. /usr/lib/mailman permissions are OK, and
permissions of non-links ar OK.
I have also added w permission to all for directories.
Alexander Gran wrote:
The thing is, that there are no attachments in the mailman folder any more:
mail:/var/lib/mailman/archives/news/attachments# l 2009*
ls: 2009*: No such file or directory
Therefore a redirect won't work.
Try /var/lib/mailman/archives/private/news/attachments
or whatever
Am Mittwoch 11 März 2009 16:05:41 schrieb Mark Sapiro:
Alexander Gran wrote:
That results in a 404, as lurker has a different mean of providing the
attachments. Any idea how to still use the mailman archiver for that.
You could put a redirect in your web server to redirect
Am Donnerstag 12 März 2009 01:43:52 schrieb Mark Sapiro:
What if anything have you set in mm_cfg.py for PUBLIC_ARCHIVE_FILE_DIR
and PRIVATE_ARCHIVE_FILE_DIR. That's where Scrubber will try to store
the attachments. It either succeeds or it encounters an error which
would be reported in
Am Donnerstag 12 März 2009 16:38:27 schrieb Mark Sapiro:
Try /var/lib/mailman/archives/private/news/attachments
Ok, that works with a symlink. It's a kludge, but thanks :)
regards
Alex
--
Dipl.-Inform. Alexander Gran
Ludwigsallee 101 52062 Aachen Germany
M: +49(0)163/5598933
Hi,
I'm using lurker to make the web archive for a mailman mailing list.
However mailman now uses wrong links in plain-text-digest for attachments,
e.g.:
https://hostname/lurker/list/news.html/attachments/20090304/be6930bd/attachment.png
That results in a 404, as lurker has a different mean of
Alexander Gran wrote:
I'm using lurker to make the web archive for a mailman mailing list.
However mailman now uses wrong links in plain-text-digest for attachments,
e.g.:
https://hostname/lurker/list/news.html/attachments/20090304/be6930bd/attachment.png
That results in a 404, as lurker has a
On 03/11/09 10:05, Mark Sapiro wrote:
You could put a redirect in your web server to redirect
https://hostname/lurker/list/news.html/attachments/ to
https://hostname/pipermail/list/attachments/ or whatever the correct
URL is.
This is a viable work around.
But, is there a way to correct the
Grant Taylor wrote:
But, is there a way to correct the actual problem of the wrong URL
rather than having to work around the problem?
Scrubber builds the URL from PUBLIC_ARCHIVE_URL which is also used to
build URLs pointing to the actual archive, so one or the other will be
wrong.
--
Mark
Alexander Gran wrote:
Am Mittwoch 11 März 2009 16:05:41 schrieb Mark Sapiro:
Alexander Gran wrote:
That results in a 404, as lurker has a different mean of providing the
attachments. Any idea how to still use the mailman archiver for that.
You could put a redirect in your web server to
I moved a mailing list from another host.
First on the target host, created a similar list, then used
add_members -f {from list_members on old host} list name.
Then I tarred the archives from the old host,
mv'd /var/lib/mailman/archives/private/list to list.save
untarred the
Anne Hammond wrote:
How can I troubleshoot? I've read the FAQ but didn't find a
recipe for migrating to another host (perhaps I should write it :)
Are there entries in any of Mailman's qfiles directories - particularly
archive/ and shunt/? Are other lists on this this installation
archiving?
Thanks for the message and hints. The archives go back to 2003.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Anne Hammond wrote:
How can I troubleshoot? I've read the FAQ but didn't find a
recipe for migrating to another host (perhaps I should write it :)
Are there entries in any of
Anne Hammond wrote:
There are no messages in archive/ or shunt/
Other lists are definitely archiving right away.
OK. Archiving in general works and ArchRunner is running (processing
the archive/ queue). No messages are shunted for archiving exceptions.
There is nothing in
Mark Sapiro wrote:
It seems like a permissions issue, but that should normally result in
error log entries and shunted messages.
Have there been many posts to the list or only a few? Is it possible
they all had X-No-Archive: or X-Archive: no headers?
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The
The one thing I didn't do was restart mailman.
The top level directory is owned by apache.mailman--Do I need
to restart apache??
Thanks for your message.
See other answers inline below.
The list that has been migrated is vorpal-users.
NOT WORKING:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] vorpal-users]# ls -la
total
Only 2 posts.
I looked through the headers, and there are not options
not to archive.
Anne M. Hammond - Systems / Network Administration - Tech-X Corp
hammond_at_txcorp.com 720-974-1840
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
It seems like a
Anne Hammond wrote:
The one thing I didn't do was restart mailman.
The top level directory is owned by apache.mailman--Do I need
to restart apache??
Apache has nothing to do with archiving. The lists/listname directory
is owned by apache because the list was created via the web interface.
Anne Hammond wrote:
var/log/mailman/error:
Dec 17 09:33:24 2006 (19861) admin.py access for non-existent list:
rm05submit
Dec 17 17:13:52 2006 (22929) No such list mapa-users:
Dec 17 18:39:15 2006 (23426) No such list farsight-users:
Dec 17 23:11:00 2006 (25598) No such list mapa-users:
Dec 18
The two messages are in
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/vorpal-users.mbox.
Now here is the problem. I thought this list was created today, but
it turns out that it was created 9.May.2006. There are 9 messages
in vorpal-users.mbox that were there before, with the 2 from today
at the end.
Anne Hammond wrote:
The two messages are in
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/vorpal-users.mbox.
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/vorpal-users.mbox or
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/vorpal-users.mbox/vorpal-users.mbox?
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/vorpal-users.mbox should be a
I will implement your latest suggestion.
Here is what I found out. The new email list was implemented
with Quarterly archiving. The old email list had Monthly
archiving.
So when you looked at the web page for the current month,
the messages from today were in Fourth quarter 2006 Archives
by
Since
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/vorpal-users.mbox/vorpal-users.mbox
(thanks for the correction)
contains only the 11 messages from the 2006-December archive, what
will happen to all these dirs from
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/vorpal-users:
drwxrwsr-x2 mailman mailman4096
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/{list}.mbox/{list}.mbox
contains all email messages since inception of the mailing list.
So it should create a new archive containing all of the
email messages since inception.
Anne M. Hammond - Systems / Network Administration - Tech-X Corp
Anne Hammond wrote:
/var/lib/mailman/archives/private/{list}.mbox/{list}.mbox
contains all email messages since inception of the mailing list.
So it should create a new archive containing all of the
email messages since inception.
I'm not sure what you are saying above, but I think it is
Anne Hammond wrote:
I will change the archiving option to Montly for the new archive,
and then sort through what you have suggested.
If you change to 'monthly' and then rebuild with bin/arch --wipe with a
complete listname.mbox file, the archive will be completely rebuilt
with monthly indexing.
SUCCESS!!
I changed the archive option to monthly
edited the vorpal-users.mbox file to include the messages desired in
the archive
mv archive/private/vorpal-users to archive/proviate/vorpal-users.save
bin/arch vorpal-users
This created the entire new pipermail archive.
Anne M. Hammond -
OK. I'm an absolute idiot! I'm very sorry for wasting
your time. You've been absolutely right the whole time
(we both just didn't know it).
So. It never reached the archive runner so it was
never archived. It was successfully sent, but never
through the actual list. I was just using mailman@ as
a
stupidmail4me wrote:
It is set to Yes.
--- Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the list's archive attribute set to Yes?
(Archiving Options in the
web admin interface)
Apply the attached patch to your mailman installation, restart Mailman,
post a message to the list and report the
Nothing. It doesn't create any log and there's no
appropriate entries in any log.
I've checked the headers for the delivered messages
and there's no x-archive headers (they're not being
myteriously added).
--- Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stupidmail4me wrote:
It is set to Yes.
stupidmail4me wrote:
Nothing. It doesn't create any log and there's no
appropriate entries in any log.
If you applied the patch and then restarted Mailman and you get no
'debug' log with any messages, either the ToArchive handler is not in
the pipeline, or you're not looking in the right
Yes, the qrunner log shows the shutdown and startup
from mailmanctl. I've also checked and ToArchive is in
the pipeline (it's not commented out or changed in any
conf file). This is why it's so odd.
--- Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stupidmail4me wrote:
Nothing. It doesn't create any
stupidmail4me wrote:
Yes, the qrunner log shows the shutdown and startup
from mailmanctl. I've also checked and ToArchive is in
the pipeline (it's not commented out or changed in any
conf file). This is why it's so odd.
The patch I posted causes ToArchive to write the 'ToArchive invoked
Yes, ArchRunner is running...
30014 ?? I 2:00.15 /usr/local/bin/python2.3
/usr/local/lib/mailman/bin/qrunner
--runner=ArchRunner:0:1 -s
But no, there's nothing in qfiles/archive.
--- Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stupidmail4me wrote:
Mail is sending through
the lists
stupidmail4me wrote:
Yes, ArchRunner is running...
30014 ?? I 2:00.15 /usr/local/bin/python2.3
/usr/local/lib/mailman/bin/qrunner
--runner=ArchRunner:0:1 -s
But no, there's nothing in qfiles/archive.
Once again, is there anything in Mailman's error log?
Also, are there any settings
Nothing in the error logs.
mm_cfg.py:
MTA = None
DEFAULT_URL_PATTERN = 'https://%s/'
DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'lists.foo.org'
DEFAULT_URL_HOST= 'lists.foo.org'
add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)
--- Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stupidmail4me wrote:
Nothing in the error logs.
Is the list's archive attribute set to Yes? (Archiving Options in the
web admin interface)
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
It is set to Yes.
--- Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stupidmail4me wrote:
Nothing in the error logs.
Is the list's archive attribute set to Yes?
(Archiving Options in the
web admin interface)
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The highway is
for gamblers,
San
I'm running Mailman-2.1.8p0 on an OpenBSD 3.9 box. I
have everything set up correctly (I've installed
successfully using older versions on older versions of
OpenBSD) as far as I can see. Mail is sending through
the lists appropriately, but it's not archiving at
all. I've checked Defaults.py and
stupidmail4me wrote:
Mail is sending through
the lists appropriately, but it's not archiving at
all. I've checked Defaults.py and mm_cfg.py and the
list's configuration options and they're all set to
archive. I've checked permissions in
/var/spool/archive/* and they appear to be fine (if I
give
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Is ArchiveRunner running?
That should be Is ArchRunner running?. Sorry for any confusion.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan
I'm currently evaluating Mailman for managing some closed mailing
lists in our company, and while most of the installation and use works
pretty well, I've been banging my head against a problem with nested
multipart messages.
One of our fellows used to always write his messages as
We had a problem where Mailman completely broke. We have since restored
it, but it is not archiving the lists' messages to the html page. What
is really strange is that one list's messages are being archived???
Thanks for any help on this.
Nancy
--
Nancy M. Montano|| 224 Cruz Alta
46 matches
Mail list logo
