Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

2008-02-10 Thread Visvanath Ratnaweera
Hi Ref: Visvanath Ratnaweera [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.02.2008 22:23 Ref: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.02.2008 20:53 Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: The testmails are also delivered. But not archived. What could be missing? Is ArchRunner running? That was it! It did a lot of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

2008-02-10 Thread Mark Sapiro
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: I did a clean-up in the server. Rather than starting qrunner, ArchRunner etc manually, /usr/local/mailman/scripts/mailman being now called with start as argument during boot. Mail delivery is OK but the archive is not created automatically. I have to call bin/arch

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

2008-02-10 Thread Visvanath Ratnaweera
Hi Mark Ref: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10.02.2008 20:28 I did a clean-up in the server. Rather than starting qrunner, ArchRunner etc manually, /usr/local/mailman/scripts/mailman being now called with start as argument during boot. Mail delivery is OK but the archive is not created

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

2008-02-10 Thread Mark Sapiro
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: My Defaults.py set it correctly --- DEFAULT_ARCHIVE = On DEFAULT_ARCHIVE_PRIVATE = 0 ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX = 2 --- and not touched in mm_cfg.py. Does an explicite override in mm_cfg.py necessary? No. Perhaps there is a permissions problem. Try running bin/check_perms.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

2008-02-10 Thread Visvanath Ratnaweera
Hi Mark Ref: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10.02.2008 21:24 Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: My Defaults.py set it correctly --- DEFAULT_ARCHIVE = On DEFAULT_ARCHIVE_PRIVATE = 0 ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX = 2 --- and not touched in mm_cfg.py. Does an explicite override in mm_cfg.py necessary?

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

2008-02-10 Thread Mark Sapiro
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: drwxrwsr-x 4 root mailman 4096 2007-11-11 15:30 archives// drwxrwsr-x 2 root mailman 4096 2007-11-13 22:55 public/ Above are good. interesting lrwxrwxrwx 1 root mailman 43 2007-11-13 22:55 /usr/local/mailman/archives/public/OURLIST -

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

2008-02-10 Thread Visvanath Ratnaweera
Hi Mark Many thanks for the hotline! Ref: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10.02.2008 23:04 Mark Sapiro wrote: Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: withing OURLIST there is some confusion: drwxrwsr-x 2 rootmailman 12288 2008-02-10 19:11 2007-September/ -rw-r--r-- 1 rootmailman 481377

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

2008-02-10 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mark Sapiro wrote: Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: withing OURLIST there is some confusion: drwxrwsr-x 2 rootmailman 12288 2008-02-10 19:11 2007-September/ -rw-r--r-- 1 rootmailman 481377 2008-02-10 19:11 2007-September.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 rootmailman 92418 2008-02-07 03:27

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

2008-02-10 Thread Mark Sapiro
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: The confustion was the difference in ownership, some owner mailman some root. Owner generally doesn't matter. It depends on who owned the process that created the file or directory in the first place. The important thing is group. Everything should be group 'mailman'

[Mailman-Users] Mails not archived (was Needs help during tranisition SOLVED)

2008-02-04 Thread Visvanath Ratnaweera
Hi all Only later I noticed that one small step is still missing: The mails are not archived! I issued # bin/check_perms -f and got a whole lot of messages like: ... article db files must be 0660: /usr/local/mailman/archives/private/ /database/2006-March-article (fixing) During the second run

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived (was Needs help duringtranisition SOLVED)

2008-02-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: Only later I noticed that one small step is still missing: The mails are not archived! I issued # bin/check_perms -f and got a whole lot of messages like: ... article db files must be 0660: /usr/local/mailman/archives/private/ /database/2006-March-article (fixing)

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mails not archived

2008-02-04 Thread Visvanath Ratnaweera
Hi Mark Ref: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.02.2008 20:53 Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote: The testmails are also delivered. But not archived. What could be missing? Is ArchRunner running? That was it! It did a lot of processing. At the end Feb 2008 archive appeared with the second