Hi
Ref: Visvanath Ratnaweera [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.02.2008 22:23
Ref: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.02.2008 20:53
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote:
The testmails are also delivered. But not archived. What could
be missing?
Is ArchRunner running?
That was it! It did a lot of
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote:
I did a clean-up in the server. Rather than starting qrunner,
ArchRunner etc manually, /usr/local/mailman/scripts/mailman being
now called with start as argument during boot. Mail delivery is OK
but the archive is not created automatically. I have to call
bin/arch
Hi Mark
Ref: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10.02.2008 20:28
I did a clean-up in the server. Rather than starting qrunner,
ArchRunner etc manually, /usr/local/mailman/scripts/mailman being
now called with start as argument during boot. Mail delivery is OK
but the archive is not created
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote:
My Defaults.py set it correctly
---
DEFAULT_ARCHIVE = On
DEFAULT_ARCHIVE_PRIVATE = 0
ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX = 2
---
and not touched in mm_cfg.py. Does an explicite override in
mm_cfg.py necessary?
No.
Perhaps there is a permissions problem. Try running bin/check_perms.
Hi Mark
Ref: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10.02.2008 21:24
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote:
My Defaults.py set it correctly
---
DEFAULT_ARCHIVE = On
DEFAULT_ARCHIVE_PRIVATE = 0
ARCHIVE_TO_MBOX = 2
---
and not touched in mm_cfg.py. Does an explicite override in
mm_cfg.py necessary?
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote:
drwxrwsr-x 4 root mailman 4096 2007-11-11 15:30 archives//
drwxrwsr-x 2 root mailman 4096 2007-11-13 22:55 public/
Above are good.
interesting
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root mailman 43 2007-11-13 22:55
/usr/local/mailman/archives/public/OURLIST -
Hi Mark
Many thanks for the hotline!
Ref: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10.02.2008 23:04
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote:
withing OURLIST there is some confusion:
drwxrwsr-x 2 rootmailman 12288 2008-02-10 19:11 2007-September/
-rw-r--r-- 1 rootmailman 481377
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote:
withing OURLIST there is some confusion:
drwxrwsr-x 2 rootmailman 12288 2008-02-10 19:11 2007-September/
-rw-r--r-- 1 rootmailman 481377 2008-02-10 19:11 2007-September.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 rootmailman 92418 2008-02-07 03:27
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote:
The confustion was the difference in ownership, some owner mailman
some root.
Owner generally doesn't matter. It depends on who owned the process
that created the file or directory in the first place. The important
thing is group. Everything should be group 'mailman'
Hi all
Only later I noticed that one small step is still missing: The mails
are not archived!
I issued # bin/check_perms -f and got a whole lot of messages like:
...
article db files must be 0660: /usr/local/mailman/archives/private/
/database/2006-March-article (fixing)
During the second run
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote:
Only later I noticed that one small step is still missing: The mails
are not archived!
I issued # bin/check_perms -f and got a whole lot of messages like:
...
article db files must be 0660: /usr/local/mailman/archives/private/
/database/2006-March-article (fixing)
Hi Mark
Ref: Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.02.2008 20:53
Visvanath Ratnaweera wrote:
The testmails are also delivered. But not archived. What could
be missing?
Is ArchRunner running?
That was it! It did a lot of processing. At the end Feb 2008
archive appeared with the second
12 matches
Mail list logo