Thanks Christian, Mark, & Stephen.
I guess this is a non-issue after all.
I've noticed that all recent posts don't have poster's address in the
Reply-To:, but is in the cc: field. I've made sure all members are set to
No-dupes.
It is a reply_goes_to_list = this list using Mailman 2.1.23.
On 3/27/22 12:02, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Getting rid of the poster address in Reply-To requires patching the
code. We are not going to change this in Mailman 2, for sure. The
general sense of the developers is that it's a bad idea to completely
remove the poster's address, and they can
Christian via Mailman-Users writes:
> Hi Michael
>
> I don’t think you have a problem here. The "From:"-address will probably
> look like this:
>
> "Firstname Lastname usern...@domain.com"
This isn't true. "domain.com" is replaced by "---" because it's
believed that having
Hi Michael
I don’t think you have a problem here. The "From:"-address will probably look
like this:
"Firstname Lastname usern...@domain.com"
This means that the original sender’s address is in the "realname" (or
"comment")-part of the address field. The sender appears still to
On 2/3/22 09:45, John McDonald via Mailman-Users wrote:
Is there any way to remove "Reply" and "Reply To" from an email sent to a
mailing list.
On the list's General Options page, setting first_strip_reply_to to Yes
will remove any Reply-To: headers that are in the incoming Mail.
--
Mark
... and, one hopes, elides the irrelevant archive postings. [Sorry,
one of my eldest crotchets.]
-Chip-
On 9/23/2020 2:11 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
If the user wants to reply to the poster in this way, she needs to edit
the recipients when composing the mail. I recognize this is
inconvenient,
On 9/23/20 8:11 AM, Thomas Gramstad wrote:
> A subscriber to a list I have with a public archive, has NOMAIL set and
> only reads and responds via the archive. But even though the list is set
> up with Reply-To: Sender as default, this subscriber, even when he is
> logged in, gets Reply-To list
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Is your list anonymous? If so, replies will always go to the list.
reply_goes_to_list = Poster merely tells Mailman to not add any
Reply-To: header to the delivered posts so replies should go to the
From: address or to the poster's original Reply-To: if any.
Hi,
thanks for
On 6/14/2010 10:23 AM, Gerard Mensoif wrote:
anonymous_list is set to No
The From is the one of the original poster, and there is no Reply-To
If the From: header has the original poster's address and there is no
Reply-To:, a simple reply should go only to the original poster. If
this is not
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 12:24 PM +0100 2005-02-24, Joakim Nomell wrote:
Correction, the reply-to-header is not missing (my Pine didn't show it).
it looks like this in some cases:
Reply-To: User [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Hackerlistan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This means that the mailing list
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Joakim Nomell wrote:
Hi all. I have switched on the filter on all my lists. I have only set it
to filter and convert HTML to plain text, all other settings are default.
In the general settings for all lists, I have set reply-to this list
instead of sender. I only want
At 12:24 PM +0100 2005-02-24, Joakim Nomell wrote:
Correction, the reply-to-header is not missing (my Pine didn't show it).
it looks like this in some cases:
Reply-To: User [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Hackerlistan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This means that the mailing list has added it's e-mail address to
On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:58 PM, Paul H Byerly wrote:
I think the issue for the developers is theory vs. reality. What
is the desired behaviour for the majority of new Mailman lists?
Should not that be the default, with appropriate explanations?
This isn't the answer some will want to hear,
On Feb 5, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Mark Dadgar wrote:
Cool! I'm a Level 10 Paladin with 115 hit points!
(ok, *now* I'm done)
lightweight. I'd have you killed, but you're not worth the karma points.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:45:16PM -0800, Mark Dadgar wrote:
On Feb 5, 2004, at 2:34 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
I can go back through the 90's, into the mid-80's if length of time
is the important criteria here. I have multiple gigabytes of e-mail
on my current system, and untold
At 3:23 PM -0800 2004/02/05, Will Yardley wrote:
Not to mention a system administrator's worst nightmare...
I am a SAGE Level IV system administrator, with fifteen years of
experience, and I've helped build some of the biggest mail systems on
the planet -- and various other related projects.
My apologies for bringing it up at all!!
I think the issue for the developers is theory vs. reality. What is
the desired behaviour for the majority of new Mailman lists? Should not
that be the default, with appropriate explanations?
Personally I am very happy with Mailman, and
On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:27 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
Not to mention a system administrator's worst nightmare...
I am a SAGE Level IV system administrator, with fifteen years of
experience, and I've helped build some of the biggest mail systems on
the planet -- and various other related projects.
On Feb 5, 2004, at 4:58 PM, Paul H Byerly wrote:
My apologies for bringing it up at all!!
Agreed! My apologies to everyone for posting a cranky note last night
and really getting the ball rolling.
Personally I am very happy with Mailman, and I find most of the
settings easy to
At 5:02 PM -0800 2004/02/05, Mark Dadgar wrote:
Cool! I'm a Level 10 Paladin with 115 hit points!
If you want to talk about DD, I do have a number of characters I
could discuss. Which version would you prefer to start with? The
original boxed edition, ADD, 2nd edition ADD, or something
John Poltorak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a way to set it as the default so that new list will be created
with this setting?
Set in mm_cfg.py ...
# Mailman can be configured to munge Reply-To: headers for any passing
# messages. One the one hand, there
Rod Roark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
How come Mailman ignores reply-to headers of incoming
messages?
Can you be a bit more specific? What do you mean 'ignores reply-to
headers?
david
22 matches
Mail list logo
