I am quite certain that this is the answer to my issue, as I see the Mailman
messages being routed through my spam filter 2x as it enters/leaves queues.
But when I tried to impliment it sendmail quit listening on port 25. Anyone
else experience issues with this solution? Any suggestions?
Knabe, Troy wrote:
You can do this without modifying your sendmail files at all. Instead, in your
startup script, add:
/usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \
-ODaemonPortOptions=Name=MSA,Port=,M=E,Addr=127.0.0.1
Did you ADD that, or replace something with
So my sendmail start script included /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -q5m
So I made it /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \
-ODaemonPortOptions=Name=MSA,Port=1313,M=E,Addr=127.0.0.1
On 8/8/08 12:04 PM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knabe, Troy wrote:
You can do this without
Knabe, Troy wrote:
So my sendmail start script included /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -q5m
So I made it /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \
-ODaemonPortOptions=Name=MSA,Port=1313,M=E,Addr=127.0.0.1
End original message. -
Put the original line
So that works, but I am still seeing 7 minutes where the messages are staying
in the sendmail queue. Sendmail is configured to re-run the queue every 5
minutes so the extra 2 is about right for how long it takes to go through the
other messages in the queue first. But why does the message hit
Knabe, Troy wrote:
So that works, but I am still seeing 7 minutes where the messages are
staying in the sendmail queue. Sendmail is configured to re-run the
queue every 5 minutes so the extra 2 is about right for how long it
takes to go through the other messages in the queue first. But why
Knabe, Troy wrote:
So that works, but I am still seeing 7 minutes where the messages are staying
in the sendmail queue. Sendmail is configured to re-run the queue every 5
minutes so the extra 2 is about right for how long it takes to go through the
other messages in the queue first. But why
Hi Graham,
At http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2002-May/019621.html I
found your post on SMTP.
I have a similar problem to the one you replied to.
i just installed Linux RedHat 9.0, and I want to use sendmail.
The emails do not leave the server though, but they are queued.
I have
At 11:53 PM +0100 2004/01/05, Dr. M.C. Koops wrote:
I have no experience with smtp, but lots of people tell me that it is
really hard to configure sendmail.
Not really. Using the m4 package, it's pretty easy to build a
sendmail.mc file that can be compiled into a suitable sendmail.cf.
Many
In message av9u4k$mh6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
so spake David Gibbs (david):
I've got an instance of sendmail listening specifically on 127.0.0.1 ... can
anyone point me to some information on how to disable synchronous dns
verification in sendmail?
The TUNING file in the sendmail directory
Folks:
The README.SENDMAIL has the following statement ...
Since Mailman usually connects via localhost (i.e. 127.0.0.1) to
the SMTP port of Sendmail, you should be sure to configure
Sendmail /not/ to do DNS verification synchronously for
localhost connections.
I've got an instance of
Title: RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman
Thanks for the answer. By default in Slackware, the sendmail queue was running every 15 minutes, so I set it to 2 minutes. That seems to have sped it up quite a bit. Now if I could just solve the DNS problem without running Bind
Title: RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman
Yah, I have done that. Decent performance gain. However I still have to use DNS for sendmail itself (don't want an open relay), and I can't run Bind on the box locally so I guess I just have to live with it.
-Original Message
Title: Sendmail Performance with mailman
I have had an ongoing problem with qrunner being extremely slow, so I tried some of the suggestions in the faq.
I made the following changes:
I added the followind to my sendmail startup
/usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \
, or a local
mail, the message is immediately sent and delivered. So it seems to be
something related to Mailman.
Eric
-Original Message-From: Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC
DIN-PACS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May
03, 2002 7:31 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject:
[Mailman-Users
On May 3, 2002 12:18 pm, Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS wrote:
As of today, I am no longer getting failures in the smtp-error logs,
however it seems that incoming messages are parsed to mailman, then
queued for 10 to 40 minutes where they just wait. No errors, no
timeouts, they just wait.
16 matches
Mail list logo
