Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users writes:
> RFC 3464 has been out for 17 years. I think it's past time that we
> stop coddling people that can't conform to it.
It's not a matter of coddling nonconformers. The only thing we are
likely to be able to do about them is "Sleeping Giants" them on
On 5/15/19 10:06 AM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote:
> On 5/15/19 10:55 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> The message body is that of a MIME multipart message, but the main
>> content type is text/plain instead of
>>
>> multipart/mixed; boundary="66728b7fa14ce3ed"
>
> RFC 3464 wants a
On 5/15/19 10:55 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
This message is a disaster. Is this an actual bounce as received? It
almost looks like an RFC 3464 compliant DSN except see comment below.
~chuckle~
Agreed.
The message body is that of a MIME multipart message, but the main
content type is text/plain
On 5/15/19 6:45 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>
> Here is the bounce message, I know I can enable VERP and this problem should
> go away, but I wanted to see if I could get this working without VERP as we
> have a large mail traffic on the list.
This message is a disaster. Is this an actual
Grant Taylor wrote:
>On 5/15/19 7:45 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>> Here is the bounce message, I know I can enable VERP and this problem
>> should go away, but I wanted to see if I could get this working without
>> VERP as we have a large mail traffic on the list.
>Did you redact anything
On 5/15/19 7:45 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Here is the bounce message, I know I can enable VERP and this problem
should go away, but I wanted to see if I could get this working without
VERP as we have a large mail traffic on the list.
Did you redact anything significant from the
Hi,
As part of some upgrade projects I am testing using a transactional email
service (Sendgrid) and have eventually got bounce forwarding working. However
Mailman is not seeing the address in the bounce so is forwarding it to the list
owner. I am probably not going to use Sendgrid
