Jim == Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jim Hi all, I've been looking into TMDA (http://tmda.net) and got
Jim to wondering if something like this (or a subset of it)
Jim should be incorporated into Mailman.
There was a thread about this in the fairly recent past, perhaps it
At 1:28 AM +0900 2006-01-30, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
There was a thread about this in the fairly recent past, perhaps it
was on mailman-developers, though. IIRC the consensus was making
this more trouble than it's worth is not going to be easy.
There is a FAQ entry on how to
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 1:28 AM +0900 2006-01-30, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
There was a thread about this in the fairly recent past, perhaps it
was on mailman-developers, though. IIRC the consensus was making
this more trouble than it's worth is not going to be easy.
There is a
Hi all,
I've been looking into TMDA (http://tmda.net) and got to wondering if
something like this (or a subset of it) should be incorporated into Mailman.
Here's my line of thinking:
What if Mailman had a means, similar to the current subscription
verification process, to verify postings to a
