Brad == Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brad At 4:08 PM -0700 2005-05-20, John W. Baxter wrote:
If the sending MUA didn't encode it, it's an MUA error (this is
NOT a new RFC)--dated in 1997.
Brad Correct, but Mailman should be able to deal with this
Brad
After running 'unshunt' I was able to coax the following error from mailman..
which sheds some light on the problem at least, though I am still quite
confused as to what the actual problem could be. The lists in question are all
in french if that makes any difference, and many french
Rob Scott wrote:
After running 'unshunt' I was able to coax the following error from mailman..
which sheds some light on the problem at least, though I am still quite
confused as to what the actual problem could be. The lists in question are
all in french if that makes any difference, and
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Rob Scott wrote:
After running 'unshunt' I was able to coax the following error from mailman..
which sheds some light on the problem at least, though I am still quite
confused as to what the actual problem could be. The lists in question are
all in french if that makes any
At 12:31 PM -0700 2005-05-20, Mark Sapiro wrote:
It looks like the message has an attached file with a lowercase e-acute
in the filename. You might be able to use bin/show_qfiles to find the
offending message.
In my experience, when you run into a problem like this,
show_qfiles
Thanks a bunch for your help Mark, though I'm afraid I'm not actually getting
any further ahead with this.. I am admittedly a mailman/python newb but I find
it hilarious and somewhat pathetic that python (or is it actually mailman?)
chokes and dies a horrible death on one little accented e.
Rob Scott wrote:
Thanks a bunch for your help Mark, though I'm afraid I'm not actually getting
any further ahead with this.. I am admittedly a mailman/python newb but I
find it hilarious and somewhat pathetic that python (or is it actually
mailman?) chokes and dies a horrible death on one
On 5/20/05 3:23 PM, Rob Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
moral of the story: Python hates the French almost as much as Dubya does..
Or perhaps Python's code likes the RFCs.
From RFC 2183:
NOTE ON PARAMETER VALUE LENGHTS: A short (length = 78 characters)
parameter value containing only
At 4:08 PM -0700 2005-05-20, John W. Baxter wrote:
If the sending MUA didn't encode it, it's an MUA error (this is NOT a new
RFC)--dated in 1997.
Correct, but Mailman should be able to deal with this issue and
at least skip the message in question and continue processing all
other
