Re: [Mailman-Users] sending mail to members in batches

2004-12-03 Thread Brad Knowles
At 11:25 AM +0900 2004-12-03, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: I agree with your analysis, but that may or may not be the desired effect here. In particular, it may be desirable to throttle Mailman specifically to something lower than the system-wide limit. The MTA may or may not be able to limit

Re: [Mailman-Users] sending mail to members in batches

2004-12-02 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Darryl == Darryl Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Darryl I'm wondering if there is a setting in mailman to send Darryl mail out to members of a list in batches - for example Darryl send 100, wait 30 seconds, send to the next 100, wait 30 Darryl seconds, and so on. Darryl

Re: [Mailman-Users] sending mail to members in batches

2004-12-02 Thread G James Jones
__ From: Stephen J. Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darryl Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] sending mail to members in batches Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:10:23 +0900 Darryl

Re: [Mailman-Users] sending mail to members in batches

2004-12-02 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
G == G James Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G I would think that throttling is an MTA issue (in this case G Exim). Given that the MTA will control the rate of ALL messages G from the system, not just those that are generated by Mailman. I agree with your analysis, but that may or

[Mailman-Users] sending mail to members in batches

2004-12-01 Thread Darryl Hamilton
Hi I'm wondering if there is a setting in mailman to send mail out to members of a list in batches - for example send 100, wait 30 seconds, send to the next 100, wait 30 seconds, and so on. The problem is we've got a list with 1000+ members, but there is a per-hour outgoing mail limit of 600 (and

Re: [Mailman-Users] sending mail to members in batches

2004-12-01 Thread Brad Knowles
At 11:00 AM +1300 2004-12-02, Darryl Hamilton wrote: I'm wondering if there is a setting in mailman to send mail out to members of a list in batches - for example send 100, wait 30 seconds, send to the next 100, wait 30 seconds, and so on. Nope. See