On May 4, 2001 at 13:15, Troy Heber wrote:
http://mysite/mailman/listinfo/ --- Everything is fine
Your resolver probably sees this as a local page?
http://mysite.mydomain.com/listinfo/ -- The page comes up but there are no
lists!
Perhaps this option (under privacy options on each list's
[posted and mailed]
On May 7, 2001 at 14:04, David Jacobson wrote:
I've setup mailman after hours of work (modifying etc). Now I need
it so I can subscribe clients _without_ a password, when I click on
the mass subscribe and put a few people in then I try and
unsubscribe it requires a
On May 5, 2001 at 20:36, Thomas von Hassel wrote:
f45IM6015850: [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Cannot mail
directly to programs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |/etc/smrsh/wrapper post tollerlist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: |/etc/smrsh/wrapper post tollerlist
--
Satya.
On May 6, 2001 at 09:42, Bruce Thomas wrote:
I am wondering if there is a method to automatically strip attachments from
messages received by the list prior to sending the message out to the list
I hear there's something called demime out there.
--
Satya. URL:http://satya.virtualave.net/
Hi all,
I've been in trouble with MailMan Web Interface. Actually its
not a problem of MailMan but of a stupid mail server that
spammed us thousands of craps repeatedly.
As a result, we have over 3000 pending request to process
left and I cannot open the Tend to pending administrative
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Satya wrote:
On May 6, 2001 at 09:42, Bruce Thomas wrote:
I am wondering if there is a method to automatically strip attachments from
messages received by the list prior to sending the message out to the list
I hear there's something called demime out there.
The welcome message when a user is joined to a mailman list includes URL's for
removeing/manageing their list description. But since I don't have a web server
I can't provide public access to these pages, I just want to use the e-mail
subscribe/unsubscribe functionality. Is there a way to
alex wetmore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something that sounded like:
http://www.phred.org/~alex/stripmime.html is one solution, and there is a
link to demime at the bottom of the page. Someone also recently checked
in patches for Mailman that does the same thing, so hopefully that will
appear
Hello. My web host provides Mailman, which worked fine until a few weeks
ago when the list info and admin pages suddenly stopped working. The
lists themselves still work fine, and subscriptions can be done via email.
But the major web interface is just gone. Does anyone have any tips I
could
HI,
Suddenly I'm getting this mail ..
Traceback (innermost last):
File /home/mailman/cron/qrunner, line 85, in ?
from Mailman import MailList
File /home/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py, line 30, in ?
Hi
Is there a way to translate the messeges ppl get when the get
automated mail from the listserver. like the password reminder, the
wellcome note etc. There in english but most my users are danish so
it would be great if u could localize it.
/Thomas
--
Thomas von Hassel
Web4Business ApS
Paghs
On Tue, 08 May 2001 21:06:36 +0900
ISO-2022-JP ISO-2022-JP wrote:
Is there any way to manually process the pending request from
command line?
Delete the relevant files from ~mailman/data/
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-(*)
At 12:01 PM 5/8/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How should I remove these (excessive headers) on each post? makes my
message long.
You would be generally ill advised to remove any of them.
Why? IMO, the List-* headers are excessive and should, at the very least,
be configurable. If I
Is there a way to keep people from unsubscribing? I know you can monitor
subscriptions, but i did not see anything about monitoring unsubscribing.
Thanks for the help.
John David Cole
University of Tennessee
Health Science Center
Computing Telecommunications
(901)448-5848
On 5/8/01 12:12 PM, Bill Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? IMO, the List-* headers are excessive and should, at the very least,
be configurable. If I want my list message to carry this info I can
already put it in the footers. Why should I force everyone to scroll past
a page long
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The List-headers are RFC-compliant. Footers are not.
What RFC says that footers are not allowed?
No one said footers are not allowed. Read what was said. Footers aren't RFC
compliant, that doesn't mean they're not allowed. List-headers on the other hand
need
I also don't see any extreme headers flowing through my system. I have an extensive
list server that is looking fine.
Which mail program are you using that shows a large header?
-Original Message-
From: Satya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL
On 5/8/01 12:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The List-headers are RFC-compliant. Footers are not.
What RFC says that footers are not allowed?
You know, we have this same argument every few weeks. Barry, can the
FAQ/INSTALL/README/etc be updated with a comment about this so
Finally, logic prevails!
If I as a lay person can figure out how to remove them, then anyone should be able to.
I am far from a programmer.
-Original Message-
From: Chuq Von Rospach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 2001-05-08 15:13 -0500, Bill Warner wrote:
At 12:42 PM 5/8/01 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
ref. Eudora .ini Settings TabooHeaders
Yes, I know about the TabooHeaders settings for Eudora, but most of my
list readers don't, and they are probably using some M$ junk to read mail
anyway, and they
Here is the address of the RFC list that pertains to structure and such.
Fair warning though. Have lots of coffee ready.
www.imc.org/rfcs.html#rfc822
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Bill Warner wrote:
Yes, I know about the TabooHeaders settings for Eudora, but most of my list
readers don't, and they are probably using some M$ junk to read mail
anyway, and they don't care about things like TabooHeaders in any case.
None of the MS Clients (at least that
Nope, no stale locks. It was having problems like that before, so I deleted the
list (saved the config file) and recreated the list, imported the config file,
and ran the arch command to reindex the archives - which got me to where I am
now. The mail goes to the list just fine, but the archives
On 5/8/01 1:48 PM, Clayton, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the address of the RFC list that pertains to structure and such.
Fair warning though. Have lots of coffee ready.
www.imc.org/rfcs.html#rfc822
Except that's not the RFC involing list-id and list* headers. And RFC822 was
At 01:33 PM 5/8/01 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
Someone posted a hack to remove the headers a while ago. Search the list
if you're interested.
OK, I found a reference to this in the archive, and located the spot to
hack the code. On my first look I didn't grep deep enough into the
distribution.
I want to setup multiple servers running (the same) mailman lists.
The ways I can think of doing this is either:
Option 1:
Setup a master machine with everything on it and export the
mailman structure for NFS so the other machines can mount it,
and use it.
On 5/8/01 3:32 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to setup multiple servers running (the same) mailman lists.
Before we start building this beast -- why?
Trying to keep the subscriber databases in sync across machines is going to
be problematic. Before we build it,
Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
Before we start building this beast -- why?
Load balancing. I prefer having one server running mailman and having all
the lists on it, however this means that machine will also get hit pretty hard
when several lists get to receive/send messages. Having a cluster
At 2001-05-08 14:55 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
On 5/8/01 1:48 PM, Clayton, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the address of the RFC list that pertains to structure and
such. Fair warning though. Have lots of coffee ready.
www.imc.org/rfcs.html#rfc822
Except that's not the
On Tue, 08 May 2001 14:27:33 -0500
John David Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to keep people from unsubscribing? I know you can
monitor subscriptions, but i did not see anything about monitoring
unsubscribing. Thanks for the help.
Currently there is no direct support for
On Tue, 08 May 2001 14:12:52 -0500
Bill Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:01 PM 5/8/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How should I remove these (excessive headers) on each post?
makes my message long.
You would be generally ill advised to remove any of them.
Why?
The list
On 5/8/01 4:01 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before we start building this beast -- why?
Load balancing.
I figured, but I wanted to make sure.
I prefer having one server running mailman and having all
the lists on it, however this means that machine will also get hit
On Tue, 08 May 2001 15:21:27 -0500
Bill Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:47 PM 5/8/01 -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
You should have made those comments to the standards
committee. The RFC is the RFC.
What RFC? If you have a cite for an RFC which says that Mailman
must add 10 lines
On Tue, 08 May 2001 13:16:12 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuq (official hard-ass of the 2002 summer olympics)
The concept of spandex covered buns at an athletic avent for SysAdms
would appear to violate several basic tenets of the physical
universe -- well, at least in my
On Tue, 8 May 2001 16:48:32 -0400
Robert Clayton Clayton wrote:
Here is the address of the RFC list that pertains to structure and
such. Fair warning though. Have lots of coffee ready.
www.imc.org/rfcs.html#rfc822
RFC 822 has been replaced by RFC 2822.
--
J C Lawrence
On 5/8/01 4:27 PM, J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, the List-* headers are excessive and should, at the very
least, be configurable.
This has been a point of contention on the list and elsewhere. I
disagree.
I'll take a middle ground. If he really feels this is how the list-*
On 5/8/01 4:35 PM, J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuq (official hard-ass of the 2002 summer olympics)
The concept of spandex covered buns at an athletic avent
Especially if they're MY buns. It'd scar some people for life...
--
Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
And services like yahoo have programmers on staff to write this stuff, and
admins on staff to manage it, and budgets for the hardware, and...
Something I don't have. :) That's why I'm trying to go as light as I can, with
currently (working) software.
How big
John David Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to keep people from unsubscribing?
Currently there is no direct support for this.
And while I understand there are certain circumstances wher ethis might be
reasonable (for instance, one of my list servers managers department lists
On Tue, 08 May 2001 16:54:59 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/01 4:27 PM, J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, the List-* headers are excessive and should, at the very
least, be configurable.
This has been a point of contention on the list and elsewhere. I
Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
Trying to keep the subscriber databases in sync across machines is going to
be problematic.
Tow things I can think off of the top of my head, one being the easiest
(maybe).
a) NFS
or b) If mailman has a way of sending a signal out when something changes
On Tue, 08 May 2001 16:57:11 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And while I understand there are certain circumstances wher ethis
might be reasonable (for instance, one of my list servers managers
department lists which are mandatory subscriptions), in general, I
have to ask
On 5/8/01 5:02 PM, J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Especially if they're MY buns. It'd scar some people for life...
I thought I mentioned that _MY_ universe was not capable of
supporting such concepts. Yeesh.
Heh. If you want to scare the children, you can go to www.chuqui.com, and
On 5/8/01 5:01 PM, J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good distinction. I still use the default Mailman footer that
points to the list page.
I've decided the default footer isn't quite good enough. And the default
mailman digest header is bad -- I've gotten any number of complaints about
On Tue, 08 May 2001 17:55:21 -0600
Ashley M Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
And services like yahoo have programmers on staff to write this
stuff, and admins on staff to manage it, and budgets for the
hardware, and...
Something I don't have. :) That's why I'm
On Tue, 08 May 2001 17:10:06 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/01 5:01 PM, J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good distinction. I still use the default Mailman footer that
points to the list page.
I've decided the default footer isn't quite good enough.
Your
Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
And your average delay in delivery is -- how long?
Generally, two to six at the most. If I don't clean out the queue because of
nasty remote servers not working properly, it can go into a day or two. That's
generally when I'll get a phone call because someone
I found the problem and was able to solve it:
when I ran the arch command to import the old archives of the list that got
moved to my machine, I ran it as root - and it set all the rwx permissions
correctly, but failed to set the ownership settings correctly (owned by root
rather than owned by
For some reason, the config.db file of the list previously in question keeps
being set to an ownership of 'nobody'. help?
EOL
Tib
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Joe Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something that sounded like:
4. Rerun check_perms and it finds 11 problems all related to files that
are not set-gid. Why did it return differently this time after I set the
owner of all files to mailman?!?
Because for security purposes the OS removes the
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Load balancing. I prefer having one server running mailman and having all
the lists on it, however this means that machine will also get hit pretty hard
when several lists get to receive/send messages.
Most of the pain is in sending the
Actually it does present a problem because this is the error it generates:
May 08 18:26:01 2001 qrunner(7593): Traceback (most recent call last):
May 08 18:26:01 2001 qrunner(7593): File /home/mailman/cron/qrunner, line
278, in ?
May 08 18:26:01 2001 qrunner(7593): kids = main(lock)
May
On 5/8/01 5:02 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a) NFS
I wouldn't even try.
or b) If mailman has a way of sending a signal out when something changes on
the .db files
No, it doesn't. Doesn't necessarily need to.
What comes to mind with this last option though is,
On 5/8/01 5:22 PM, J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've decided the default footer isn't quite good enough.
Your complaint?
Minor ones:
___
sharks mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hockeyfanz.com/mailman/listinfo/sharks
Neither of
On Tue, 08 May 2001 22:07:42 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/01 5:22 PM, J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've decided the default footer isn't quite good enough.
Your complaint?
Minor ones:
___
sharks mailing
From going through the mail logs on the server, I can see that the same
message was sent to one person 76 times in one day and 33 times the next
day, at which staged I deleted all the queue files in the qfiles directory
and the mailouts stopped. The mail list has feature turned on that
On 5/8/01 10:57 PM, David Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So from what I can tell, my mailing list server is sending out all the dups.
But that doesn't tell you where they're coming from. Who's creating the
duplicates? You? Or someone else? Until you figure that you, you won't
really solve
57 matches
Mail list logo
