Hi
I have installed and configured mailman
One issue is still remaining please help me regarding ..
need some help how do settings related to web interface
my company url is www.google.com/a/oscpro.in
and my mail-Id is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and also my gmail-id is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web server is
We are planning to implement spam blocking as I found in some
postings on the net.
Presenty, when we create a new list it sends an email of the form
The mailing list `xyz' has been created via the through-the-web
interface. In order to complete the activation of this mailing list,
the
proper
But those two files are identical.
-Steven
On 11/1/07, Steve Burling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On November 1, 2007 8:59:53 PM -0500 Steven **
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. $ cat /etc/aliases
## mailman mailing list
mailman: |/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post mailman
I am sorry to ask such a basic question, but would it be possible for
a list member (or the moderator or the list admin or the site admin)
to create a user alias, defined as allowing a user's second email
address to post to a list based on the membership of that user's
primary email
On 11/1/07, Steven ** wrote:
Seems like my [EMAIL PROTECTED] listinquestion lines
are not being parsed. Are those supposed to go in the aliases file?
I'm thinking no. So, where should they be?
Yes, in the aliases file. However, you should have a colon after the
alias and before the
On 11/1/07, Steven ** wrote:
3. $ cat /etc/aliases
[ ... deletia ... ]
$ sudo newaliases
WARNING: local host name (montgoss-server) is not qualified; see
cf/README: WHO AM I?
/etc/mail/aliases: 21 aliases, longest 52 bytes, 1218 bytes total
Note that these two file names are
On 11/1/07, Mikael Hansen wrote:
I am sorry to ask such a basic question, but would it be possible for
a list member (or the moderator or the list admin or the site admin)
to create a user alias, defined as allowing a user's second email
address to post to a list based on the membership
Upon further inspection, they are identical... now. I'm guessing
they weren't before. Because, now when I run newaliases, I get:
$ sudo newaliases
WARNING: local host name (montgoss-server) is not qualified; see
cf/README: WHO AM I?
/etc/mail/aliases: line 28: missing colon
/etc/mail/aliases:
--On November 1, 2007 8:59:53 PM -0500 Steven **
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. $ cat /etc/aliases
## mailman mailing list
mailman: |/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post mailman
mailman-admin:|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman admin mailman
snip
$ sudo newaliases
WARNING:
Ben O'Shea wrote:
Ok, I'm across all that. The thing is, we have had a few users
actually post messages to this list and I get a message saying the
post requires moderator approval. I then go and approve the message,
however each day I am notified about the same messages (i.e. ones I
have
I just took those virtual mappings out of the /etc/mail/aliases file
and re-ran newaliases. I tested via telnet and the message posted to
the list! So, apparently my listinquestion aliases weren't in both
aliases files originally.
-Steven
On 11/1/07, Steven ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upon
Brad Knowles wrote:
If you're going to implement any kind of anti-spam system, make sure
to implement that only within your MTA (sendmail, postfix, Exim,
whatever). Make sure that you don't ever accept a message and then try
to bounce it --that's called backscatter and makes you as bad as
Steven wrote:
I just took those virtual mappings out of the /etc/mail/aliases file
and re-ran newaliases. I tested via telnet and the message posted to
the list! So, apparently my listinquestion aliases weren't in both
aliases files originally.
There are two separate things.
Aliases of the
Brad Knowles wrote:
In addition, an admin can also subscribe users and set them to be
NOMAIL, or add an address to the whitelist.
whitelist = Privacy options...-Sender filters-accept_these_nonmembers
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area,
On Nov 1, 2007, at 20:40, Mark Sapiro wrote:
whitelist = Privacy options...-Sender filters-
accept_these_nonmembers
I like this because it does not artificially inflate the number of
members on a list. But it is unfortunately very probable I would one
night wake up bathed in sweat fearing
On Nov 1, 2007, at 21:32, Mikael Hansen wrote:
On Nov 1, 2007, at 20:40, Mark Sapiro wrote:
whitelist = Privacy options...-Sender filters-
accept_these_nonmembers
That's interesting. Your sentence was wrapped so that the greater
than sign came to begin the following line and as such was
On 11/1/07, Mikael Hansen wrote:
I like this because it does not artificially inflate the number of
members on a list. But it is unfortunately very probable I would one
night wake up bathed in sweat fearing that I may not have removed a
corresponding whitelist entry at the time a given
17 matches
Mail list logo
