I did a test - I disabled the SpamAssassin integration and watched the heap
grow steadily - I do not believe its SA related:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:mailman-2.1.9 10:51pm 68 # pmap 22804 | egrep heap
08175000 14060K rwx--[ heap ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:mailman-2.1.9 10:51pm 69 # pmap 22804 | egrep
Back at the beginning of this thread, Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
Config:
Solaris 10 x86
Python 2.5.2
Mailman 2.1.9 (8 Incoming queue runners - the leak rate increases with this)
SpamAssassin 3.2.5
At this point I am looking for ways to isolate the suspected memory leak - I
am looking at using
On Die, 2008-07-01 at 16:39 +1000, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
I am unsubscribing. Thanks very much for helping with my inquiry, Mark. The
other queries don't apply to me, and I can offer no help with them.
On my inquiry, one would think that an OS that wants to rule the world would
be
Hi,
I bought a dedicated server to host my list with .. but for my surprise,
mailman did not exist in its control panel which is webmin .. in cpanel u can
just click a button and it will do everything but not in webmin ..
I tried to follow the installation instructions from the site
John Hicks wrote:
Heady from this success, I re-reconfigured the list to enable full
personalization. My client posted his first message using this
configuration Sunday night and it is still being processed (Tuesday
night). The smtp log is filling with entries indicating either one or
three
Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
I did a test - I disabled the SpamAssassin integration and watched the heap
grow steadily - I do not believe its SA related:
OK.
Does your MTA limit the size of incoming messages? Can it?
At some point in the next day or so, I'm going to make a modified
scripts/post
Khalil Abbas wrote:
Hi,
I bought a dedicated server to host my list with .. but for my
surprise, mailman did not exist in its control panel which is webmin
.. in cpanel u can just click a button and it will do everything but
not in webmin ..
I tried to follow the installation instructions
Folks:
On a lark, I created a Mailman group on LinkedIn.
If you would like to join the group, visit
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/134598/181E8C14C43E.
david
--
IBM i on Power Systems - For when you can't afford to be out of business
--
On 7/2/08 8:15 AM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
I did a test - I disabled the SpamAssassin integration and watched the heap
grow steadily - I do not believe its SA related:
OK.
Does your MTA limit the size of incoming messages? Can it?
No, Yes
#
David Gibbs said the following on 02/07/2008 17.21:
If you would like to join the group, visit
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/134598/181E8C14C43E.
Good idea! I just joined the group.
Ciao,
luigi
--
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\
Hackers do it with all sorts of characters.
Last night I added
ulimit -v 5
To the /etc/init.d/mailman script and restarted
And I am seeing the processes stop growing at 49M - and so far no adverse
affects.
I view this as a workaround until the underlying cause is determined...
But it also allows me to bump my incoming runners from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 2, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
At some point in the next day or so, I'm going to make a modified
scripts/post script which will queue incoming messages in qfiles/bad
and then move them to qfiles/in only if they are under a certain
Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
Or is there not a way expire restart mailman processes analogous to the
apache httpd process expiration (designed to mitigate this kind of resource
growth over time)?
You can do mailmanctl restart, but that's not really a proper solution to
this problem.
--
Brad
Currently when ever I try to get to the mailman archives for any of the
mailing lists I revcive a 403 error.
When I check the apache error log i see the following line:
[Wed Jul 02 10:28:52 2008] [error] [client some ip] client denied by
server configuration: var-install-location/archives/public/
I am hopeful our esteemed code maintainers are thinking the built in restart
idea is a good one:
BW wrote:
Or is there not a way expire restart mailman processes analogous
to the
apache httpd process expiration (designed to mitigate this kind of
resource
growth over time)?
bin/mailmanctl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 2, 2008, at 1:12 PM, Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
I am hopeful our esteemed code maintainers are thinking the built in
restart
idea is a good one:
Optionally, yes. By default, I'm not so sure.
- -Barry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Interesting, the growth per python is limited to 50M by ulimit -v 5, but
I'm seeing each one gradually take up that limit - then what ? (stay tuned!
- mailman fails to malloc?)
load averages: 0.14, 0.11, 0.11
10:14:43
120 processes: 119 sleeping, 1 on cpu
CPU states: 93.9% idle, 3.7%
I had a parallel thread on the dtrace list to get memleak.d running
http://blogs.sun.com/sanjeevb/date/200506
- I just got this stack trace from a 10 second sample of the most actively
growing python mailman process - the output is explained by Sanjeev on his
blog, but I'm hoping the stack
Below is the findleaks output from a ~5minute sample of a python runner - I
will take a larger sample to see if this is representative or not:
(again the reference is http://blogs.sun.com/sanjeevb/date/200506 )
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ 2:10pm 67 # ./findleaks.pl ./ml.out
Ptr=0xcf890340 Size=16
Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
Interesting, the growth per python is limited to 50M by ulimit -v 5, but
I'm seeing each one gradually take up that limit - then what ? (stay tuned!
- mailman fails to malloc?)
Look in Mailman's error and qrunner logs.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The
Robert Campbell wrote:
Currently when ever I try to get to the mailman archives for any of the
mailing lists I revcive a 403 error.
When I check the apache error log i see the following line:
[Wed Jul 02 10:28:52 2008] [error] [client some ip] client denied by
server configuration:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Luigi Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Gibbs said the following on 02/07/2008 17.21:
If you would like to join the group, visit
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/134598/181E8C14C43E.
Good idea! I just joined the group.
And for those on Facebook:
Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
On 7/2/08 8:15 AM, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At some point in the next day or so, I'm going to make a modified
scripts/post script which will queue incoming messages in qfiles/bad
and then move them to qfiles/in only if they are under a certain size.
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 2, 2008, at 11:01 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
The attached 'post' file is a modified version of scripts/post.
Hi Mark, there was no attachment.
It does the following compared to the normal script.
The normal script reads the message from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Warsaw wrote:
| On Jul 2, 2008, at 11:01 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
|
| The attached 'post' file is a modified version of scripts/post.
|
| Hi Mark, there was no attachment.
Yes, I know. I was just about to resend. It is attached here. The MUA I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 2, 2008, at 11:15 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Yes, I know. I was just about to resend. It is attached here. The
MUA I
used to send the previous message gives any attachment without an
extension Content-Type: application/octet-stream, so the
Configuration
- CentOS 5 64 bit
- Mailman 2.1.9
- Qmail with Plesk 8.3 mods
I have an interesting bounce issue occurring.
- Email is sent to a Mailman List
- List sends to each address
- One of the addresses bounces
- The bounce message ends with the right FROM and TO headers, but the wrong
Michael Kabotwrote:
Configuration
- CentOS 5 64 bit
- Mailman 2.1.9
- Qmail with Plesk 8.3 mods
I have an interesting bounce issue occurring.
- Email is sent to a Mailman List
- List sends to each address
- One of the addresses bounces
- The bounce message ends with the right FROM and TO
Barry Finkel writes:
I have not yet installed my 2.1.11 package on my test machine, but
my records show that I had the identical messages when I built my
2.1.9 package, which I use in production. I am not an expert in the
C language and what type conversions are done. But I would not
Dear All,
I have a list with of 500 user and 20-25 post per day.
My list administrator disable list archiving by mistake from last three
month and now he want them back.
As we know mailman save mails in mbox formate and from that file it
generate archive regularly.
So i take all the mails that
30 matches
Mail list logo
