[Mailman-Users] Manually bouncing messages to a mailman list

2008-08-09 Thread Cristian Rigamonti
Hi list. Here's an interesting (at least for me :) mailman problem that I could not manage to solve. If I manually bounce messages to a mailman list (I mean: using the bounce command in mutt, or the mail redirect thunderbird plugin), the messages seems to disappear: - they don't get delivered to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Manually bouncing messages to a mailman list

2008-08-09 Thread Mark Sapiro
Cristian Rigamonti wrote: If I manually bounce messages to a mailman list (I mean: using the bounce command in mutt, or the mail redirect thunderbird plugin), the messages seems to disappear: snip Could it be that the Resent-* headers that get added to the bounced message are somehow

[Mailman-Users] changes at aol

2008-08-09 Thread Rick Pasotto
debian Linux mnr.niof.net 2.6.24-1-686 #1 SMP Thu May 8 02:16:39 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux mailman 2.2.11-2 exim4 4.69-6 Before sending out my last mailing (it's an announce list) I set mailman to do 'full personalization' so I could find out who was hitting the spam button. The TOS notifications

Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

2008-08-09 Thread Robert Braver
On Saturday, August 9, 2008, 11:24:42 AM, Rick Pasotto wrote: RP What exactly is this telling me? Does mailman or exim need to be changed RP or do I need to do something? Follow the links for more information that are provided. It's pretty clear. You don't really have to do anything. The spam

Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

2008-08-09 Thread Steven Stern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/09/2008 12:16 PM, Robert Braver wrote: | On Saturday, August 9, 2008, 11:24:42 AM, Rick Pasotto wrote: | | RP What exactly is this telling me? Does mailman or exim need to be changed | RP or do I need to do something? | | Follow the links for

Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

2008-08-09 Thread Robert Braver
On Saturday, August 9, 2008, 1:40:19 PM, Steven Stern wrote: SS On 08/09/2008 12:16 PM, Robert Braver wrote: [...] SS | This means you will have to track down the individual message by SS | the Message ID in order to identify the email address of the SS | specific recipient. SS If you add

Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

2008-08-09 Thread Rick Pasotto
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 01:49:50PM -0500, Robert Braver wrote: On Saturday, August 9, 2008, 1:40:19 PM, Steven Stern wrote: SS On 08/09/2008 12:16 PM, Robert Braver wrote: [...] SS | This means you will have to track down the individual message by SS | the Message ID in order to identify

Re: [Mailman-Users] changes at aol

2008-08-09 Thread Mark Sapiro
Rick Pasotto wrote: On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 01:49:50PM -0500, Robert Braver wrote: On Saturday, August 9, 2008, 1:40:19 PM, Steven Stern wrote: SS On 08/09/2008 12:16 PM, Robert Braver wrote: [...] SS | This means you will have to track down the individual message by SS | the Message ID

[Mailman-Users] policy errors ..

2008-08-09 Thread Khalil Abbas
Hi, I have a dedicated server with debian operating system installed.. I used the following command line to install mailman: apt-get install mailman then used: bin/checkperms to check my installation and found 76 errors .. then I ran: bin/checkperms -f to fix and it fixed most

Re: [Mailman-Users] policy errors ..

2008-08-09 Thread Mark Sapiro
Khalil Abbas wrote: I have a dedicated server with debian operating system installed.. I used the following command line to install mailman: apt-get install mailman then used: bin/checkperms to check my installation and found 76 errors .. then I ran: bin/checkperms -f to fix and