On 6/19/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
Doing a diff on the generated archives, the only problem with the bad one
is that it has the UL and /UL's placed wrong.
It tends to be very eager with UL so everything gets down to third level
That could be an issue with the Python libraries.
Depending
On 17 Jun 2008, at 06:01, Brad Knowles wrote:
On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
I copied a list's mbox to a new server and regenerated the archive.
Unfortunately threading is not rendered satisfyingly, here are the
two Mailman/pipermail versions:
Your threading got broken somehow, but I
Allan Odgaard wrote:
Raw mbox file.
And new letters sent to the list also show up with wrong indent in the
web archive.
I'm only guessing, but I think there must have been some issue with the
mbox file that caused the archive database file to be messed up.
Does a new list work OK?
What
On 18 Jun 2008, at 17:45, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Allan Odgaard wrote:
Raw mbox file.
And new letters sent to the list also show up with wrong indent in
the
web archive.
I'm only guessing, but I think there must have been some issue with
the
mbox file that caused the archive database file
Allan Odgaard wrote:
On 18 Jun 2008, at 17:45, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Does a new list work OK?
A new list show the same problem.
What does bin/cleanarch say about the mbox file? Did bin/arch report
anything odd?
I dont recall so. But since this happens both for new letters to this
list,
On 18 Jun 2008, at 22:46, Mark Sapiro wrote:
[...]
I have never before seen a report like this. Since it occurs for a new
list, there is apparently something wrong with the Mailman
installation itself. If it were a problem with the Ubuntu package, I
think it would have been seen elsewhere, so I
On 19 Jun 2008, at 07:00, Allan Odgaard wrote:
On 18 Jun 2008, at 22:46, Mark Sapiro wrote:
[...]
I have never before seen a report like this. Since it occurs for a
new
list, there is apparently something wrong with the Mailman
installation itself. If it were a problem with the Ubuntu
I copied a list’s mbox to a new server and regenerated the archive.
Unfortunately threading is not rendered satisfyingly, here are the two
Mailman/pipermail versions:
Old: http://lists.textdrive.com/pipermail/textmate/2008-January/thread.html
New:
On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
I copied a list's mbox to a new server and regenerated the archive.
Unfortunately threading is not rendered satisfyingly, here are the
two Mailman/pipermail versions:
Your threading got broken somehow, but I can't tell you how. This
would need further
