-Original Message-
From: Harold Paulson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
more than being disk or CPU bound, isn't this mostly,
have-to-send-an-email-to-each-address bound?
No...
I did the same thing last thursday without email notification.
Unsubscribed 4000+ adresses which took about
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:56:13 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/13/01 3:43 PM, Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to unsubscribe about 1000 addresses from a list of
about 12,000.
It is taking -forever- . Watching ~logs/subscribe, addresses are
being
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, J C Lawrence wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:56:13 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/13/01 3:43 PM, Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to unsubscribe about 1000 addresses from a list of
about 12,000.
It is taking -forever- .
On 7/14/01 11:32 AM, J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to brief examination here its lock bound rather than IO or
CPU.
So mailman is setting and removing the lock for every address? If so --
Barry, isn't that a design flaw for this case?
--
Chuq Von Rospach, Internet Gnome
I'm trying to unsubscribe about 1000 addresses from a list of about
12,000.
This is on FreeBSD 4.3, a dual-proc PIII 500. Otherwise un-loaded.
Command-line:
~/bin/remove_members -f /tmp/un-newsletter newsletter
It is taking -forever- . Watching ~logs/subscribe, addresses are being
On 7/13/01 3:43 PM, Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to unsubscribe about 1000 addresses from a list of about
12,000.
It is taking -forever- . Watching ~logs/subscribe, addresses are being
un-subscribed at about 1 message per second.
Is this normal?
Wouldn't surprise