On 11/04/14 03:19, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I'm not sure why you can't upgrade if you can patch the code, but in any
case, I can't point you at a single patch to do it my way because there
are several. You could do it by applying all of the following patches in
order.
Thank you very much, Mark!
(my apologies to anyone who reads NANOG, this is mostly a repeat
of what I said there)
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:36:16AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
It *is* a shame that these anti-spam defenses knowingly break mailing lists.
It's a shame that this is being pushed as an anti-spam defense when
On 04/10/2014 05:30 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I have tentatively scheduled an open space for Friday, 11 April at 18:00
in room 523B at Pycon to talk about DMARC and mail lists. All available
interested parties are invited. If the time doesn't work, we can reschedule.
I will need to reschedule
On April 11, 2014 7:21:49 AM EDT, Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
On 04/10/2014 05:30 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I have tentatively scheduled an open space for Friday, 11 April at
18:00
in room 523B at Pycon to talk about DMARC and mail lists. All
available
interested parties are invited. If
On 04/11/2014 05:25 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Tentatively rescheduled to 17:00 EDT (21:00 GMT) on Friday, 11 Apr in room
525.
I will attempt to post realtime summaries on #mailman.
Due to various scheduling issues, this will be rescheduled for Saturday
evening (Montreal time). Details to
Hi,
Le 28/03/2014 16:58, Mark Sapiro a écrit :
As it says in that post, scrub_nondigest is an all or nothing feature.
I may code the behavior I've described for my need :
Detaching attachment, storing, linking back into the original mail.
4.67. How do I implement a custom handler in
On 04/11/2014 08:54 AM, Sylvain Viart wrote:
4.67. How do I implement a custom handler in Mailman
http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030615
Following instruction here, I've started to develop my custom handler,
as Scrubber is scrubbing too strong for my purpose.
Sylvain Viart writes:
Development question, is there a way to test the handler against a mail
content, outside of the full mailman context?
I forget the exact incantation, but I have a test list, and just test
for the test list at the top of the Handler, and return success
immediately.
I hadn't heard of this till now. Could somebody please confirm if my
understanding of the issue is correct?
This is what I'm thinking will happen, please correct where I'm wrong:
- A list member sends an email to the list from a yahoo address
- The list sends that email out to all the list
On 04/11/2014 06:28 PM, Peter Shute wrote:
I hadn't heard of this till now. Could somebody please confirm if my
understanding of the issue is correct?
This is what I'm thinking will happen, please correct where I'm wrong:
- A list member sends an email to the list from a yahoo address
-
Our observation here has been that only Yahoo addresses, and those of other
services which also uses the DMARC algorithm generate bounces. Because the
From: address contains yahoo.com, and the IP address of the list server does
not reverse resolve to a yahoo.com server, the list email is
11 matches
Mail list logo
