On 11 Mar 2015, at 8:06, Thomas Wölk wrote:
@Benny: I think Jeremy idea is very clever. What is the best way to
deals with different __reply templates per recipient__?
I don't think there is any way to do that.
It is very annoying every time to edit the text again.
I distinguish between the
@Benny: I think Jeremy idea is very clever. What is the best way to
deals with different __reply templates per recipient__? It is very
annoying every time to edit the text again.
I distinguish between the following types (very different between DE and
EN) :
- close friends ⇢ _Hi, Hello, Salu
On 29 Sep 2014, at 5:32, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
I then learned that the email.reply event only processes the email you
are replying to, not the message as a whole.
Is there an event I could use to alter the message as a whole?
No.
Maybe email.edit, email.compose or something? I did find in th
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:54:31 +0200 Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
A short term solution would be to support the insertion of the
advanced type of format strings. I’ve
changed `MmReplyWroteString` such that if the first character
is `{` then it’s the “advanced” formatting style. This works
in the ne
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Kai Großjohann wrote:
>
> And don't we all love those responses that say "Please see my replies below
> in orange."
Don't get me started. OTOH, a few times I've tried to do inline replies, and
the had to go to someone's desk to explain which parts were mine. I
On 19 Sep 2014, at 11:21, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014, at 21:48, Kai Großjohann wrote:
Actually, I find that the Outlook threading is better than I had
feared. It actually works pretty well for a "linear" thread like
this one (the one I'm responding to):
I think I should add h
On 18 Sep 2014, at 21:48, Kai Großjohann wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014, at 17:54, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014, at 14:42, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
My company wants corporate email replied to in Outlook fashion :-(.
That is simply depressing. I cannot imagine the reasoning behind such
a st
On 18 Sep 2014, at 17:54, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014, at 14:42, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
My company wants corporate email replied to in Outlook fashion :-(.
That is simply depressing. I cannot imagine the reasoning behind such
a strange requirement. I might be alone on this, but
On 18 Sep 2014, at 11:54, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014, at 14:42, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
That is simply depressing. I cannot imagine the reasoning behind such
a strange requirement. I might be alone on this, but when I see this
quoting style then “competent professional” are not the
On 18 Sep 2014, at 14:42, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
OK, that got me a step closer, however I'm not exactly sure how to use
the ${cc} variable correctly, or maybe it can't be. It is returning to
me only the first person on the Cc list, not the entire list. Is there
a way to get the Cc list?
No, so
On 18 Sep 2014, at 8:27, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 17 Sep 2014, at 23:53, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
Are the variable expansions available for use listed somewhere?
No, they are implicitly available in this file:
MailMate.app/Contents/Frameworks/OakMIME.framework/Resources/specifiers.
On 17 Sep 2014, at 23:53, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
Are the variable expansions available for use listed somewhere?
No, they are implicitly available in this file:
MailMate.app/Contents/Frameworks/OakMIME.framework/Resources/specifiers.plist
But it might be easier to create a smart mailb
Are the variable expansions available for use listed somewhere?
Jeremy
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
13 matches
Mail list logo
