On 3/16/2024 1:31 PM, Slavko via mailop wrote:
And the same RCF clearly suggests to leave other (even invalid)
signatures untouched.
Which text in RFC 6376 says that?
Perhaps you are thinking of Section 6.1 which includes:
INFORMATIVE NOTE: The rationale of this requirement is to permit
Dnia 17.03.2024 o godz. 16:17:10 Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop pisze:
> >My current ISP (BTW, one of the biggest cable providers in Europe, you can
> >probably guess which one it is) currently provides by default an IPv6 *only*
> >connection to the home users, even if you have IPv4-only devices in
According to Marco Moock via mailop :
>Am 16.03.2024 um 17:44:09 Uhr schrieb John Levine:
>
>> It appears that Marco Moock via mailop said:
>> >> But who will follow 13 years old standard... ;-)
>> >
>> >When Google and Co. make DKIM mandatory, this will be hard, because
>> >those messages are
Am 17.03.24 um 14:05 schrieb Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop:
Dnia 17.03.2024 o godz. 08:30:39 Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop pisze:
does IPv6 (not exclusively though), and I've been trying to usher in
the future by setting up at least dual stack on my home DSL
connection (that at least works now after
DKIM policy is
reject or quarantine.
That's DMARC, not DKIM.
DKIM does a signature. DMARC uses it (and/or SPF).
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
Dnia 17.03.2024 o godz. 08:30:39 Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop pisze:
> does IPv6 (not exclusively though), and I've been trying to usher in
> the future by setting up at least dual stack on my home DSL
> connection (that at least works now after years of IPv6 routing
> issues with my previous
Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop skrev den 2024-03-17 13:38:
Dnia 16.03.2024 o godz. 13:08:52 Benny Pedersen via mailop pisze:
bingo its why its tempfailed, gmail should redesign how to handle
maillists where message-id can come to inbound on gmail, should not
count on message-id abuse counts
Dnia 16.03.2024 o godz. 16:57:54 Andy Smith via mailop pisze:
> On this list one might argue¹ that we all have MUAs capable of
> filtering etc. without subject tag and that we all know where the
> mail came from without an explanatory footer because we know to look
> at List-* headers. So maybe
Dnia 16.03.2024 o godz. 13:08:52 Benny Pedersen via mailop pisze:
>
> bingo its why its tempfailed, gmail should redesign how to handle
> maillists where message-id can come to inbound on gmail, should not
> count on message-id abuse counts
Well... from Google's point of view, it seems like a
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 16 Mar 2024 16:53:23 +0100 Marco Moock via mailop
napísal:
> Forwarding (e.g. forwarding as attachment etc.) is still a thing and
> if it is about security, I only trust e2e encrypted mails to be not
> eavesdropped. Everything else is just a guess and nothing else.
TLS is
Am 16.03.2024 um 17:44:09 Uhr schrieb John Levine:
> It appears that Marco Moock via mailop said:
> >> But who will follow 13 years old standard... ;-)
> >
> >When Google and Co. make DKIM mandatory, this will be hard, because
> >those messages are likely to be rejected.
>
> Why do you
Am 17.03.24 um 04:23 schrieb Jarland Donnell via mailop:
I'm gonna be "that guy" though for a minute.
If there are any IPv6 only mail servers, they are hobbyists trying to prove a point. There are a ton of IPv4 only mail
servers. In short, there is no benefit to sending mail over IPv6 beyond
12 matches
Mail list logo
