. 3600 IN MX 10 smtp.indra.com,
LookupServer 549ms
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:48 AM Marco Moock wrote:
> Am Wed, 10 Apr 2024 07:14:41 -0700
> schrieb Russell Clemings via mailop :
>
> > There was an outage starting Sunday on indra.net and although they
> > say it's up again n
There was an outage starting Sunday on indra.net and although they say it's
up again now, I'm still getting no response from their nameservers and mail
for their users (or user, as I see only one) is still stacking up in my
queue. Seems as if maybe they forgot to update the DNS for one of their
If the scammers actually had such a video, wouldn't they include a
screenshot?
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 9:03 AM Peter N. M. Hansteen via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:10:13AM +0100, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
> wrote:
> > Tonight we received a huge wave of
I saw it a couple of weeks ago. Similar, a server reporting in via cron. It
was pretty easy to fix once I realized that I needed a separate SPF for
each subdomain. I had thought the record for the parent domain would cover
it, but I guess I was the only person who thought that.
On Wed, Jan 24,
Since exim_mainlog rolled over Saturday night, I see 332 successful
incoming emails from onmicrosoft.com and 52 spam rejects. Based on the
subject lines, all of the successes were spam. So I've added "blacklist
from *.onmicrosoft.com" to spamassassin. I just hope people won't be too
disappointed
But
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/admin/setup/domains-faq?view=o365-worldwide
says:
"You can keep using the initial onmicrosoft.com domain even after you add
your domain. It still works for email and other services, so it's your
choice."
... or am I misunderstanding?
I'm
I am using Exim but the problem has gone away now. I did notice that this
server (a Leaseweb VPS, formerly Servint) was briefly on the UCEPROTECT3
about that time. I can't believe that Gmail would use that list for scoring
but maybe there was a problem with a neighbor on the server that caused
I'm getting a lot of these today. Is it just me? This first one is an
ordinary notification from nytimes.com. The second looks like similar from
foodandwine.com.
2023-04-07 00:09:03 1pkZa6-00043Q-06 H=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
[142.251.163.27]: SMTP timeout after sending data block (40945 bytes
Comcast is another good one.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023, 9:08 AM Jeff Ginsberg via mailop
wrote:
> Hello Mailops!!!
>
>
>
> New to the list so any help would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> When setting up feedback loops is it best practice to use abuse@domain as
> the reporting address?
>
> If we use the
Thanks for the responses, on and off list. I think we found the problem --
outdated reports for an SPF problem that was fixed more than a month ago.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 11:23 AM Russell Clemings
wrote:
> We're getting rejects from Gmail (mostly) claiming an SPF failure, but I
> can't see
We're getting rejects from Gmail (mostly) claiming an SPF failure, but I
can't see any problem.
Here's an example of the rejection notice:
Last error: 5.0.0 5.3.0 - Other mail system problem 550-'5.7.26
This message does not pass authentication checks
(SPF and DKIM both\n5.7.26 do not pass). SPF
Thanks, that should help. Almost all of the outgoing mail on this server
comes from one domain though.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:11 AM Frank Heydlauf via mailop
wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 12:15:46PM -0700, Russell Clemings via mailop
> wrote:
> >Than
5K a day over the course of 2 months. Many big senders will start
> their warmup at 10K a day.
>
> laura
>
>
>
> On 7 Jul 2022, at 20:15, Russell Clemings via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Thanks, but the part I don't know is how to segment the outgoing mail.
> Usin
Lather rinse and repeat until all email goes new and none goes old. Delete
> the DNS records for the old platform.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
>
>
> *From:* mailop *On Behalf Of *Russell
> Clemings via mailop
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:19 PM
> *To:* ma
How exactly does one ramp up the volume when migrating to a new mail
server? I once asked an ISP and never got a real answer. I couldn't see how
to send 10% to the new server today, 20% tomorrow, etc.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022, 11:14 AM DJ Anderson via mailop
wrote:
> Before putting it into service I
That is configurable since mailman 2.1.18. Details:
https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:22 AM Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
wrote:
> Dnia 20.06.2022 o godz. 20:05:37 Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop pisze:
> > > Mailing lists can operate minimal changes, like this list does, for
>
I got a complaint yesterday from someone who got a warning on a google
groups message forwarded via our site. We have SPF but it originated with
Verizon so I suspect a DMARC issue.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 11:04 AM Zube via mailop wrote:
> > +1 from here. Customers are ticketing in left and right
I've noticed though that if you don't have _both_ SPF and DKIM, you risk
getting routed to the spam folder, and/or getting the scary yellow "Be
careful with this message" warning.
Several users have reported this and I've seen it myself with a couple of
messages to my gmail from my website. Still
I know EIG is unpopular but I've had my personal domain on asmallorange.com
for more than a decade (pre-EIG) and have no complaints. I'm on the $10.65
monthly plan but they have one for $7.88 per month.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 10:01 AM Brayden via mailop
wrote:
> Digital Ocean blocks port 25 by
Another possibility is that the user set up an autofilter and forgot about
it. I've seen this happen with Comcast's webmail. Not sure about Yahoo --
looking quickly I don't see a way to autofilter into spam, but I might be
missing something.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 2:01 PM Matt Vernhout via
Yes, thanks. I got other replies as well and will follow up if needed.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:55 PM Udeme Ukutt wrote:
> Russell, I replied you off list.
>
> - Udeme
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:14 PM Russell Clemings via mailop <
> mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>
Does anyone on this list have a contact for Synacor, or at least one of the
ISPs that appear to use them (centurylink.net, hughes.net, wowway.com,
tds.net, q.com, possibly others)?
We're seeing false-positive bounces ("554 5.7.1 [VI-1] Message blocked due
to spam content in the message") from
I think I've seen this, and it sounds like this issue:
https://forum.directadmin.com/threads/autoreply-with-srs.52738/
I opened a ticket on cPanel when I first noticed this about four years ago:
https://forums.cpanel.net/threads/srs-and-autoreply-on-gmail.600287/
No satisfactory fix to date,
So basically a false positive then and nothing much to be done about it
except by Verizon. Oh well. I just hope the user isn't packing for Italy
right now.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 7:56 AM Bill Cole via mailop
wrote:
> On 26 Apr 2021, at 4:34, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
>
> > Abaca is a spam
Here's a question that I don't think has been asked here before:
What does it mean when you get a reply "451 Message temporarily deferred -
Abaca" on Yahoo/Verizon/AOL?
I see this from time to time but I can't find any references to "Abaca" in
the list archives.
Right now I've got a message in
I don't really understand why anybody would use UCEPROTECT3 anyway.
The first sentence of their web page says:
"This blacklist has been created for HARDLINERS. It can, and probably will
cause collateral damage to innocent users when used to block email."
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 6:21 AM Robert Rubenking via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>
> They also state that anything marked as spam will ding the reputation of
> relay service.
> "If you report these as spam, your email provider will see Relay as the
> source of spam, not the original
I believe Mailman 3 can be used in both forum and mailing list mode. At
least, the Mailman 3 users list looks pretty forumish:
https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/mailman-us...@mailman3.org/
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 4:01 AM Louis Laureys via mailop
wrote:
> > Perhaps some forums can
There's a list here:
https://wiki.list.org/COM/Mailman%20hosting%20services
I don't vouch for any of them but EMWD is pretty active on the Mailman
lists. The rest I know nothing about.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:35 AM Dave Shevett via mailop
wrote:
> Hey folks, maybe ya'll can help us out.
Seeing a lot of this:
Connecting to mx1.comcast.net [96.114.157.80]:25 ... failed: Connection
timed out (timeout=5m)
Connecting to mx2.comcast.net [68.87.20.5]:25 ... connected
H=mx2.comcast.net [68.87.20.5]: Remote host closed connection in response
to initial connection
My guess is that mx1
Have you at least signed up for all the feedback loops you can find? That
seems to help with reputation and it also helps you track down and counsel
users who think the spam button is the same thing as the delete button.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 9:16 AM Leo Gaspard via mailop
wrote:
> Michael
host mx03.oxsus-vadesecure.net [147.135.97.26]
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
550 5.7.1 Message rejected - OXSUS0001_507
Anyone know what this means? (Besides the obvious.) Googling
"OXSUS0001_507" yields nothing. It's coming from mail sent to Earthlink.net
and
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 6:59 PM Jay R. Ashworth via mailop
wrote (in part):
>
> but my experience of email carrier buyouts is that no-one *ever* sunsets
> the
> domain names, cause there's no real reason to do so, and it pisses off
> end-users.
>
>
Tell that to Comcast, which bought attbi.com and
I see similar things from Comcast occasionally (including this morning).
The "retry time not reached for any host for 'comcast.net'" error does in
fact appear to come from Exim. The error from Comcast is from the first
send attempt: "Remote host closed connection in response to initial
I've noticed when using Gmail that I can trash a message, or I can report
it as spam and (sometimes) choose between "report" and "report and
unsubscribe."
But I don't think I can "trash and unsubscribe," and I don't think there's
a way (other than scrolling through the message looking for a
What's the alternative? Throw it away?
FWIW, here's a detailed explanation of the change:
https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 1:13 PM Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
>
> On 4 May 2019, at 19:18, Ángel via mailop wrote:
>
> > On 2019-05-04 at 14:44 -0400, Bill Cole via mailop
36 matches
Mail list logo
