Re: [mailop] Malformed To: header

2023-12-30 Thread Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop
> > > recently i see messages from this ML rejected by my MTA, due > > > malformed To: header (from postmas...@inter-corporate.com): > > > > > >To: mailop@mailop.org > > Unrelated to the question of whether or not @ merits escaping or quoting... > > I personally wouldn't put an email

Re: [mailop] Malformed To: header

2023-12-30 Thread Al Iverson via mailop
> > recently i see messages from this ML rejected by my MTA, due > > malformed To: header (from postmas...@inter-corporate.com): > > > >To: mailop@mailop.org Unrelated to the question of whether or not @ merits escaping or quoting... I personally wouldn't put an email address in the

Re: [mailop] Malformed To: header

2023-12-30 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via mailop
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023, Slavko via mailop wrote: Hi, recently i see messages from this ML rejected by my MTA, due malformed To: header (from postmas...@inter-corporate.com): To: mailop@mailop.org AFAIK, the display name have to be quoted (@ char in it), thus my MTA is right, but... Please,

Re: [mailop] Malformed To: header

2023-12-30 Thread Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop
Indeed, you are correct -- according to section 3.2.3 in RFC 5322, the at ("@") symbol counts as a "special" character that's categorized seprarately from "atext," and an example in Appendix A demonstrates quoting when a special character is present: RFC 5322 ::