[sNip]
> I didn't know about the X-Face header! Is that something still in use?
[sNip]
By the way, in my previous reply to you, I meant to include this
link to a page on one of NASA's web sites that describes the PBM
image file format; here it is:
pbm - portable bitmap
> > It can be useful to show X-Face or Gravatar from certain mails, such as
> > those coming from a (trusted) forum (hint to Louis: it may be useful to
> > be able to configure the images to show for specific senders)
>
> Will be implementing something like this later on, probably for workplace
>
> It can be useful to show X-Face or Gravatar from certain mails, such as
> those coming from a (trusted) forum (hint to Louis: it may be useful to
> be able to configure the images to show for specific senders)
Will be implementing something like this later on, probably for workplace
platforms.
On 2024-01-11 at 17:43 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> And it's clearly visible from the Laurent's mail that if MUAs will display
> the unverified BIMI logos (and what would prohibit them from that?) the
> "authentication" factor can be even weaker than with no avatars at all -
> because user who is
