Hi,
On 9/20/07, Mike Adair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I in favour of the ideas presented here as long as it doesn't cause
> problems getting patches back on to the trunk when they are ready.
I totally agree.
Regards,
Andreas.
---
I in favour of the ideas presented here as long as it doesn't cause
problems getting patches back on to the trunk when they are ready.
Mike
Steven M. Ottens wrote:
> Gertjan van Oosten wrote:
>
>> As quoted from Linda Derezinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>>> I like the idea. Do we h
Gertjan van Oosten wrote:
> As quoted from Linda Derezinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I like the idea. Do we have any diskspace restrictions from codehaus
>> that we need to worry about?I would like to separate it from the
>> commiters sandbox tree. So create a new directory contribute
Hi
GeoUser wrote:
> Excellent guide. But i have few problems.
>
> 1.
>
>
>> var _3=document.createElement("script");
>> _3.readyState=="complete";
>> this.loadingScripts.push(_3);
>>
> should second line b
>> _3.readyState="complete";
>>
Sounds logical
> And what can i do if Firefox
Excellent guide. But i have few problems.
1.
> var _3=document.createElement("script");
> _3.readyState=="complete";
> this.loadingScripts.push(_3);
>
should second line be
> _3.readyState="complete";
>
And what can i do if Firefox says:
> Error: window[_23] is not a constructor:
>
As quoted from Linda Derezinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I like the idea. Do we have any diskspace restrictions from codehaus
> that we need to worry about?I would like to separate it from the
> commiters sandbox tree. So create a new directory contribute at the
> same level as sandbox, t