On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:29:06 -0800, Zac Spitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
saying all of that, when i have run up a VMWARE of XP with MGOS on my
laptop it was a lot slower than running natively, but it was a laptop!
On Feb 7, 2008 10:52 AM, Martin Fafard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's a
hardware. Not bad for a virtualized environment.
Thanks,
Trevor
-Original Message-
From: James Card [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 9:18 AM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] MapGuide OpenSource On VM-Ware Servers
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17
i guess the million dollar question here is what other images are running on
the machine?
if they are low cpu type apps then it might be ok, mapguide is very bursty
cpu wise and this
could adversely affect the other images...
Based on what Trevor said, you could also investigate the option of
I think you can use an alternative system of virtualization.
I had vmware, and cost CPU, process, stability.
I changed to VirtualBOX, and now is the best solution to do benchmarks.
Good luck!
--
View this message in context:
It's a little bit slower for me.
Martin F
James Card a écrit :
We have a client asking about performance of the MapGuide server on
VMware, compared to running the server on the bare machine. I know
some of the folks here are running the MapGuide server in VMware
environments -- have any of
off the top of my head, my rule of thumb is to check the amount of RAM
required to
render your largest layer which requires all the of the layer, ie at the
full extents of your
map. Ideally having twice the RAM available required for that will help.
SDF is also more efficient that a DB layer (ie
