Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-02-26 Thread Kajar
But is it possible to create map which have fixed extents and zoom level so user cant zoom and pan over limits the map have? -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Mapguide-user-rights-based-on-area-tp5100199p5106122.html Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list

Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-01-28 Thread Berg, James
] Mapguide user rights based on area Can't you just make two maps and give out two different links. If you aren't spawning a link from a Programmed page just send the two groups different urls. - sent via mobile phone ___ mapguide-users mailing list

Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-01-27 Thread Rémy GOURRAT
No, it's not possible without specific development. Rémy ___ mapguide-users mailing list mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users

Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-01-27 Thread Berg, James
For something like that you would have to create programming logic with the web server API. If I was the one who needed to implement what you described I would start by creating a database of some kind to store user account information along with some parameters for permissions (access to

Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-01-27 Thread Kajar
Thanks for advice. That i thought its not smartest thing to do. I just want to use one map definition for both users who have differents rights(one user have permission to see several layers and other user cant). I just thought if I let one user to see specific layer and second one just cant

Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-01-27 Thread Ryan Northcott
Can't you just make two maps and give out two different links. If you aren't spawning a link from a Programmed page just send the two groups different urls. - sent via mobile phone On Jan 27, 2014, at 4:14 PM, Kajar kajar.kulds...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for advice. That i thought its