Re: ol start with a specific number?

2011-04-11 Thread Lou Quillio
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de wrote: * Waylan Limberg way...@gmail.com [2011-04-07 04:15]: I'm not opposed to adding this, but I noticed that no other implementation (of those on Babelmark) implements this by default (not counting Pandoc's extended

Re: ol start with a specific number?

2011-04-07 Thread Sherwood Botsford
Markdown support is sufficiently fragmented that anyone who moves MD files from one system to another without checking may be justly said to be getting what he deserves. It's getting apparent that JG has little interest in further work on markdown. It is time to pretend that he has been abducted

Re: ol start with a specific number?

2011-04-07 Thread Fletcher T. Penney
I myself have thought about the benefits of establishing a standards body/committee/whatever to define Markdown moving forward. One comment --- if JG is not going to further maintain Markdown, such a syntax may need to be renamed to make it clear that it not his canonical version, but is

ol start with a specific number?

2011-04-06 Thread Waylan Limberg
We recently received a request and working patch for Python-Markdown which adds support for starting an ordered list with the number given on the first line. For example: 3. Foo 4. Bar would result in ol li start=3Foo/li liBar/li /ol I'm not opposed to adding this, but

Re: ol start with a specific number?

2011-04-06 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Waylan Limberg way...@gmail.com [2011-04-07 04:15]: I'm not opposed to adding this, but I noticed that no other implementation (of those on Babelmark) implements this by default (not counting Pandoc's extended mode). I haven't checked if other implementations offer this as an option. John’s