Hello.
I just must say that I have tried Fletcher Penneys version of multi markdown
recently.
The 3.x version seems to me to be very suitable for the task of converting to
LaTeX,
which is slightly more complicated than converting to HTML.
I have tried pandoc, but I find it far more easier to
On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:46 PM, David Chambers wrote:
Check out Jeremy Ashkenas's docco. Truly beautiful.
People might also be interested in appledoc, which uses Discount to parse
comments.
--
Rob McBroom
http://www.skurfer.com/
___
Markdown-Discuss
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Rob McBroom mailingli...@skurfer.com wrote:
On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:46 PM, David Chambers wrote:
Check out Jeremy Ashkenas's docco. Truly beautiful.
People might also be interested in appledoc, which uses Discount to parse
comments.
There is also Apydia [1],
Hi Bob, hi Waylan,
There seems to be no end in good news I definitely need to study all
that. Thank you very much!
What I like in Markdown, compare to other lightweight-markups and in this
context of program documentation, is the two little, but very useful
features: backticks around a
Interesting concept, but I think you have it partially reversed.
You want php - codedown - web
I think it would be better:
codedown - php
codedown - markdown - web
One of the weaknesses for most programming is that people postpone writing
the documentation.
In one of the few programming
Hi Sherwood,
Thank you very much for your interest and reply!
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Sherwood Botsford sgbotsf...@gmail.comwrote:
Interesting concept, but I think you have it partially reversed.
You want php - codedown - web
I think it would be better:
codedown - php
codedown
Check out Jeremy Ashkenas https://github.com/jashkenas's
doccohttp://jashkenas.github.com/docco/.
Truly beautiful.
David
On 11 April 2011 13:32, bucephalus org bucephalus@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sherwood,
Thank you very much for your interest and reply!
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:05 PM,
