Dear All,
I would like to suggest the following.
Regarding the label, what do you think about 'Standard'. For enterprise version
probably we can have Premium/Prime/Plus.
Rationale: it have all the standard functionality and if we need some premium
support we need to pay for the same.
As there is a project for new front page (at least I perceived that way),
I personally would op for two different doors (in the long term)
A page directed to non-commercial entity's | A page directed to
commercial entity's (and non-profits). More or less Cor his message
Or even more split out
LibreOffice Fresh/Stable differentiation should be dropped.
Replaced by LibreOffice Rolling. [Or LibreOffice (Cutting) Edge]
Or maybe even simply LibreOffice Fresh.
With a description of they audience/ and character of the software.
Being latest and greatest. With some rough edges.
Don't think
I think that the prominent box at the top linking to reasons why
businesses should find a supported release to be desirable is a
good improvement.
However, for the remainder of the page the existing content was
much better, and much more accurate.
"LibreOffice 7.0.x: If
Hi Mike
Am 11.11.20 um 17:22 schrieb Mike Saunders:
Hi Andreas,
On 11/11/2020 17:18, Andreas Mantke wrote:
why is a TDF LibreOffice release not useful for business users?
It doesn't say it's not useful.
maybe from your point of view, but a visitor will get another impression.
The visitor
Hi Andreas,
On 11/11/2020 17:18, Andreas Mantke wrote:
>
> why is a TDF LibreOffice release not useful for business users?
It doesn't say it's not useful.
> Why need they to buy support from a company etc., listed on a special
> website?
It doesn't say they NEED to do anything. It just points
Hi,
Am 11.11.20 um 15:30 schrieb Mike Saunders:
Hi Cor, everyone,
On 11/11/2020 14:19, Cor Nouws wrote:
You may have noticed my suggestion - somewhere past weeks - on a simple
but a clear change in the download, where every professional/business
user immediately notices the situation, without
Hi Mike,
I think that looks good, I agree that the dissemination needs to be
highlighted early to emphasise the purpose of the version.
Kind regards,
James
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, 14:31 Mike Saunders, <
mike.saund...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi Cor, everyone,
>
> On 11/11/2020 14:19, Cor
Hi Cor, everyone,
On 11/11/2020 14:19, Cor Nouws wrote:
>
> You may have noticed my suggestion - somewhere past weeks - on a simple
> but a clear change in the download, where every professional/business
> user immediately notices the situation, without putting any limitation
> in the freedom
Hi
No one in the meeting at https://jitsi.documentfoundation.org/plan ???
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Uwe Altmann
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
Hi Italo, all,
Thanks for the clear explanation and helping the discussion Italo and
great to see all ideas!
Italo Vignoli wrote on 09/11/2020 23:52:
> First of all, thanks for the proposals, although most of them are still
> focusing on community members and not on end users. Sorry, but the
Hi Marina, all,
Le 11/11/2020 à 11:09, Marina Latini a écrit :
> On 09.11.2020 16:04, Italo Vignoli wrote:
>
> Hello Italo and Community,
> thanks for your inputs here.
and thanks for yours, I fully share your analysis :) Jumping to your
comments
[...]
>> 1. Product Label for the community
On 09.11.2020 16:04, Italo Vignoli wrote:
Hello Italo and Community,
thanks for your inputs here.
Initially I was not in favour of a label at all and you all know,
resistance to change is an uneasy beast to deal with. ;)
Thinking better to this proposed change I need to admit that indeed, a
13 matches
Mail list logo
