Le 2010-10-27 13:26, jonathon a écrit :
* Why ODF formats are better;
* Why use LibO;
Of all the arguments presented, in my opinion, these two are the most
important. It we are to market LibO then we also market ODF by default.
The ODF is what will change the scene in the US market
Frank Esposito wrote:
Problems with adoption as far as I can ascertain are as follow:
The single biggest problems with adoption is lack of awareness.
It is possible to solve feature problems, it is not possible to solve
the lack of awareness.
No one is going to install an unknown software,
Le 2010-10-26 15:17, Drew Jensen a écrit :
The efforts should express strong commitment to, support of and
advancement of the ODF, from a marketing perspective I would say that
could be (should be IMO) 100% across the board. I would be hard pressed
to see producing some marketing item for
Sorry maybe I am not understanding you correctly, but if you are
suggesting that any advertising materials should make mention of TDF -
Libo - ADF, well then, I am 100% in agreement with you.
Right - what I was trying for, not well either, was that somme items
might have LibreOffice
Le 2010-10-26 16:31, Drew Jensen a écrit :
Sorry maybe I am not understanding you correctly, but if you are
suggesting that any advertising materials should make mention of TDF -
Libo - ADF, well then, I am 100% in agreement with you.
Right - what I was trying for, not well either, was
Can Libo add opxml imoport function?
Dave Johnson
On Oct 26, 2010 3:31 PM, Drew Jensen d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Sorry maybe I am not understanding you correctly, but if you are
suggesting that any...
Right - what I was trying for, not well either, was that somme items
might have
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 00:42 +0200, Italo Vignoli wrote:
Drew Jensen wrote:
Howdy Italo,
that's not true - end user / small business / and commercial size
adoption is far from nil - not 20$ but depending on whose numbers your
use it is from 7% - 11%. It was the same web based survey
* It is ugly
This is a very subjective call, so not worth consideration outside a UX
needs
improvement in some areas
UX can make or break a product, just ask Steve Jobs and therefore IS worth
consideration. Someone even brought up this point on the first conference
call (sorry I cannot
On 10/26/2010 7:14 PM, Frank Esposito wrote:
snip
Not as many issues as MSO has with ODF, and LibO/OOo is standards compliant
yes but the world uses MSO so that point is moot if were are trying to get
them to use LO/OO. and the average user or business IT person usually
does not even
Can a plug-in be made to save OOXML format for LibO for a short term solution?
On Oct 26, 2010, at 7:14 PM, Frank Esposito wrote:
* It is ugly
This is a very subjective call, so not worth consideration outside a UX
needs
improvement in some areas
UX can make or break a product, just
Le 2010-10-26 16:35, Dave Johnson a écrit :
Can Libo add opxml imoport function?
Dave Johnson
On Oct 26, 2010 3:31 PM, Drew Jensend...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Sorry maybe I am not understanding you correctly, but if you are
suggesting that any...
Right - what I was trying for, not well
Le 2010-10-26 18:02, Graham Lauder a écrit :
On Sunday 24 Oct 2010 02:11:52 Frank Esposito wrote:
I posted a question as to why choose MS Office over OO on hacker news
and although I only got 4 responses, they kind of match my own
experience with OO.
here is the discussion:
Le 2010-10-23 01:41, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Marc,
Marc Paré wrote (23-10-10 02:13)
Just thought that I would start a thread on LibO use in Business as
there was a mention of weak areas in the suite that prevents its use and
an efficient tool.
Great idea.
I know there has been pretty much
On Saturday 23 Oct 2010 21:26:05 Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-10-23 01:41, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Marc,
Marc Paré wrote (23-10-10 02:13)
Just thought that I would start a thread on LibO use in Business as
there was a mention of weak areas in the suite that prevents its use and
an
I posted a question as to why choose MS Office over OO on hacker news
and although I only got 4 responses, they kind of match my own
experience with OO.
here is the discussion:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1816102
Problems with adoption as far as I can ascertain are as follow:
* It is
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 08:11 -0500, Frank Esposito wrote:
I posted a question as to why choose MS Office over OO on hacker news
and although I only got 4 responses, they kind of match my own
experience with OO.
here is the discussion:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1816102
Problems
On Sunday 24 Oct 2010 03:02:13 Ian wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 08:11 -0500, Frank Esposito wrote:
I posted a question as to why choose MS Office over OO on hacker news
and although I only got 4 responses, they kind of match my own
experience with OO.
here is the discussion:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey everyone,
I'm new here so I hope no one minds me just jumping in. LibO usability
is something that is near and dear to my heart so I thought this was a
good thread to 'get up all in'.
On 10/23/2010 8:11 AM, Frank Esposito wrote:
snip
* it
Just thought that I would start a thread on LibO use in Business as
there was a mention of weak areas in the suite that prevents its use and
an efficient tool.
Marc
--
E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at
Hi Marc,
Marc Paré wrote (23-10-10 02:13)
Just thought that I would start a thread on LibO use in Business as
there was a mention of weak areas in the suite that prevents its use and
an efficient tool.
Great idea.
I know there has been pretty much said and collected around that on the
OOo
20 matches
Mail list logo
