David - what I meant was, no strategic partnership between the distros.
Ubuntu wouldn't pose so many difficulties if M. Shuttleworth/Canonical got
behind Sugar for example.
Sean
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:46 AM, David Farning dfarn...@activitycentral.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:07
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
David - what I meant was, no strategic partnership between the distros.
Ubuntu wouldn't pose so many difficulties if M. Shuttleworth/Canonical got
behind Sugar for example.
In my conversations with Shuttleworth and Redhat they
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry Sebastian, yes I should have been more clear about which Sebastian
:-)
At the time, Sugar was perceived as being only available on OLPC XOs, so our
effort was designed to show that it was available for other
