Hi,
Luis Villa a écrit :
On 7/10/05, Andreas Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.viralata.net/blog/archives/2005/07/08/poster-source-published/
Is the wiki inappropriate for this for some reason?
No, now that attachments work again (they didn't for some reason a
while).
Hi all,
The Wiki allows, as we all know, sub-pages with the notation
/SectionName/SubPage
This is a very useful way to identify grouped pages with a namespace,
and it's particularly useful if a great number of disparate groups are
sharing the same wiki (as is our case).
However, going beyong
Hi,
Murray Cumming a écrit :
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:26 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
However, going beyong 2 levels is ususally not a good idea, and going to
4 is definitely a bad idea.
Why?
Wow. I thought it was obvious, but you're forcing me to think about it.
OK... the first 3 are for
I tend to use these deeper pages to tack less-interesting stuff on to
more interesting stuff, to avoid cluttering the interesting stuff.
I tend to feel that the advantage of the wiki is that it's editable, and
I'm not so worried about the links being easy to write. I hate wikiwords
and I use
Hi,
Murray Cumming a écrit :
I tend to use these deeper pages to tack less-interesting stuff on to
more interesting stuff, to avoid cluttering the interesting stuff.
If we don't link to the uninteresting stuff anywhere except where it's
being tacked on, there's no clutter (except namespace
Hey, all-
Thanks to Andreas Nilsson, there is a vastly new and improved nautilus
web page up:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/nautilus/
Just thought I'd spread the love around. Thanks a bunch to Andreas to
putting it together, and for being patient with me for the month it
took to get it checked
Luis Villa wrote:
Hey, all-
Thanks to Andreas Nilsson, there is a vastly new and improved nautilus
web page up:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/nautilus/
Just thought I'd spread the love around. Thanks a bunch to Andreas to
putting it together, and for being patient with me for the month it
took
Luis Villa wrote:
Thanks to Andreas Nilsson, there is a vastly new and improved nautilus
web page up:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/nautilus/
q
Are you a coder, artist, documentaion writer or translator?
/q
Small typo above - *documentation* and not otherwise.
Rgds
SM
--
You see
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:58:06 +0200
Jaap Haitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice!!
Isn't it a nice idea to have a kind of gnome template for all the
projects hosted on http://www.gnome.org/projects/*?
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2005-June/msg00147.html
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 at 11:17:38 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
I think pretty much everything is ready logistically (we have about
3 for sure, and five if things work out) But I need a little help
in locating the GNOME poster that I think was last headed out to
California last year. If
Sri,
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 14:51 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
I am. But I've decided to give out livecds from the booth instead.
It would be niec to start off with maybe 500 Live CDs and then if
we want more I can go and buy some more and press them.
Have you sourced the first 500 CDs or
On 7/20/05, Sri Ramkrishna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, behind on my mail. I'd like some help. But I can probably try
to find someone here so that we can save money on shipping.
We can always go back to the guy who did them for LWE if need be; he
can work on pretty short notice. But yeah,
Alright. As for the size of the booth, I believe it is 10x10.
My brother said he might help me design one as well. But yeah, if you
could sent it that would be cool. I can probably send it back with
someone going back to California or whatever.
sri
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 19:01 +0200, Tim Ney,
13 matches
Mail list logo
