On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 15:46 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
I think this is very debatable. For instance,
guadec.org was (is) far from perfect and, in fact, it lacks many points
any decent website should have. None of the points you make have direct
relation with the CMS, but to our lack of
Hi :o)
About Drupal vs MediaWiki vs etc, there is not much point discussing
tools before agreeing requirements. By July 17th Greg Nagy needs to come
up with a list of requirements for the wgo platform (CMS). Help him with
the requirements if you want to help selecting the most appropriate
quote who=Quim Gil
- CMS: we need agreed platform(s) to start building upon. Greg Nagy is
responsible of defining the requirements and get to a resolution.
The CMS needs to be able to authenticate users against LDAP, and possibly
use LDAP groups for authorisation (though our requirements there
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 00:58 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 12:25 -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
[snip]
And I did not make it clearer because I've already exposed this concern
to qgil in the process of setting up drupal for guadec.org.
As said, I don't think the
Hey,
Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Personally, it's probably more effective to walk around with a
shoulder bag filled with GNOME CD's and schmooze at OSCON which is
really the kind of conference where I find booths to be of limited
effectiveness.
Sounds like a good plan - I'll be up at OSCON too
