We are happy with the default GNOME logo
http://live.gnome.org/LogoGuidelines , yes. The only comments were about
having it bigger than now in the who homepage.
El dc 09 de 08 del 2006 a les 18:58 +0100, en/na LeeTambiah va escriure:
Are we still using the usual logo for the new wgo? Or is
There is a concern about the font used in the GNOME Logo. It's Trebuchet
MS and it's a non-free font. That might even cause some licensing
problems. I remember that people passed their concerns to Dave or Board.
I don't know the outcome of this discussion, but what I know is non-free
font is still
There is a concern about the font used in the GNOME Logo. It's Trebuchet
MS and it's a non-free font. That might even cause some licensing
problems. I remember that people passed their concerns to Dave or Board.
I don't know the outcome of this discussion, but what I know is non-free
font is
On Wed, 2006-09-08 at 20:36 +0200, Claus Schwarm wrote:
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:01:23 +0200
Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shouldn't be talking about navigation bars yet, but I'll try. This
structure could bring us to a nav bar like this:
[GNOME logo] Know - Try - Learn - Work -
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 01:51 -0600, Gezim Hoxha wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-08 at 11:19 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
snip
My draft is just that, a draft, and only part of one
at that.
I'm trying to think in terms of paths through the
site. My scenarios are these:
* new to GNOME:
Oh, yes. Forgot about the font.
The board hasn't made an official decision as far as I remember, but
from different comments I would say we are happy with the use of a free
font and with Mairin Duffy's suggestion.
However, let's keep the currently official logo in the mockups since the
change is
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 01:47:18 -0600
Gezim Hoxha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also don't like Know for some reason. I think maybe because
it sounds like there is some knowledge expected already or I can't
quite pin down my dislike for Know. Get to know or Discover
would work better, I think.
Ok, then. This looks good:
[GNOME logo] Discover - Try - Learn - Create - Join
I think Learn is in fact better, softer than study. You learn from
life. A learning experience sounds positive and exciting. Study is
always a conscious action, you don't study by accident. You can learn
though just
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:27 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
[GNOME logo] Discover - Try - Learn - Create - Join
I think Learn is in fact better, softer than study.
[snip]
Anyway, I guess what counts here is to have the opinion of native
English speakers.
Hi! John the native English speaker here.
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 22:07 +1200, John Williams wrote:
I have come to this discussion late and am trawling through the archives
to get some context. Forgive me if I say something silly ;-)
Me too.. .. :)
I really like the idea of using verbs instead of nouns in the
navigational structure.
I still think Learn is better than Ask. Ask is good to reflect
mail/forum/IRC, but shadows documentation. True, from Learn to
'support forums' there is a gap, but I think the meaning is better
covered than using Ask. If we find the 'I want to ask something' use
case is relevant we can have a
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 13:04 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
I still think Learn is better than Ask. Ask is good to reflect
mail/forum/IRC, but shadows documentation. True, from Learn to
'support forums' there is a gap, but I think the meaning is better
covered than using Ask.
I think Get Help covers
Corey Burger wrote:
Hey all,
Jorge and I are headed to LWE:SF next week and I discovered that we
have no banners. I thus decided to take this into my own hands and get
one printed. However, I need feedback on the attached file within 3
hours, in order for them to get it printed by Monday,
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 17:01 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
[GNOME logo] Know - Try - Learn - Work - Join - Enjoy!
Know = About
Try = Download
Learn = Support
Work = Development
Join = Community
Enjoy! = the Fresh show candy page suggested at
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 13:56 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 12:58 +0200, Claus Schwarm wrote:
Maybe it's useful to remember that the products.html page was in the
'About' section: The navigation of the product pages needs some serious
thought unless we want to go deeper
I've finished work on condensing the different drafts,
and following some feedback from Quim, it's on the
wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewWgoStructure
Note that the top-level section titles are not
necessarily the navigation bar link phrases. I was
thinking in terms of URLs rather than
El dj 10 de 08 del 2006 a les 15:17 +0200, en/na Gergely Nagy va
escriure:
Know = About
Try = Download
If we have to explain even to ourselves what these buzzwords mean, how
do we expect the visitors to understand it? :)
Hey Flanagan :)
I wasn't explaining. Claus had asked for
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:55:51 +0100 (BST)
Joachim Noreiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've finished work on condensing the different drafts,
and following some feedback from Quim, it's on the
wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewWgoStructure
We cannot do it like this, IHMO.
The
On 8/10/06, Andreas Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Corey Burger wrote:
Hey all,
Jorge and I are headed to LWE:SF next week and I discovered that we
have no banners. I thus decided to take this into my own hands and get
one printed. However, I need feedback on the attached file within
--- Claus Schwarm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The structure lacks a portal for third-party
developers: This is
GNOME's most important product. The desktop has no
real selling points
unless lots of third-party dev's use the dev.
platform.
Fair enough. Could you add something to the plan for
quote who=Corey Burger
http://warbard.ca/temp/official-desktop-happy-corey-2.svg
Could we avoid the Official Desktop of Happy People thing? It really isn't
a very positive message... Given that it doesn't say anything about GNOME, I
have to judge it on brand expression - I'm really not sure
On 8/10/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Corey Burger
http://warbard.ca/temp/official-desktop-happy-corey-2.svg
Could we avoid the Official Desktop of Happy People thing? It really isn't
a very positive message... Given that it doesn't say anything about GNOME, I
have to
22 matches
Mail list logo
