We are in the mid of a first real iteration.
Documents approved:
- http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/WgoScope
- http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/WebPolicies
- http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/Goals
- http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/DevelopmentTimeline
Scope and policies can be considered stable
Forgot to mention, an updated schedule is available at
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/DevelopmentTimeline
The new version shows the progress in tasks and the name of the new
designer. :)
--
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org | http://guadec.org
signature.asc
Description: Això és una
Hi all,
(adding gnome-journal-list on CC since there are some people with
unnatural abilities when it comes down to write/proofread english on
this list ;-)) (but I don't think we need to send replies there, so
please try to not spam them when replying!)
Le lundi 21 août 2006, à 15:39, Davyd
--- Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- writing the start page: it should be quite
easy, but we can improve
it. See [3] for an example.
I've not included a start page in the plan for the new
WGO structure (
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewWgoStructure )
I can't see what it is
--- Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- writing the release notes front page
- writing the start page
+ if we want a press release
Still no feedback about my proposal to have these
three pages in a
single one. Less work for probably a better result.
I hadn't seen that, but
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 11:41 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi all,
- creating a live cd (or even better, live cds for various
languages): this is really something people like. I don't know how
hard this is, though.
This is something I was intending to work on but not necessarily
Hi,
I just heard about it, and thought some here might be interested
as well:
http://www.spreadgnome.org/
The news story says the site was done by
http://www.phoronixnetworks.com/
Hopefully, there was no important memo I missed: It was news for me.
I scanned the planet and footnotes, but
El dc 23 de 08 del 2006 a les 11:31 +0100, en/na Joachim Noreiko va
escriure:
I hadn't seen that, but I'm proposing pretty much the
same.
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2006-August/msg00147.html
+ attach with the content proposed for the common 2.16 page
Vincent Untz escribió:
Hi all,
(adding gnome-journal-list on CC since there are some people with
unnatural abilities when it comes down to write/proofread english on
this list ;-)) (but I don't think we need to send replies there, so
please try to not spam them when replying!)
Le lundi 21 août
We better define now if we have one or two navigation bars, since the
decision affects not only LayoutPlanning but also NewWgoStructure and of
course the navigation itself, and all the subsites.
I propose to have a general GNOME nav linking subsites, not a mixture of
subsites and wgo pages as we
Ahoy,
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 14:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's using a custom Phoronix CMS system
under the hood, and can basically handle any other valid features that
users might request.
It would have been really nice if you'd opted for Drupal, which SpreadFirefox,
An element that escaped from Vincent's plan for the 2.16 release notes
was the banner to be featured at least in the wgo homepages. Luckily
Andreas not just thought about it but also brought PingunZ (forgot to
ask the name), who has a first alpha:
Hi!
I like the idea of promoting speakers -- provided you find people
willing to get promoted. ;-)
However, while thinking about a few more notes I started wondering
what we should do with footnotes? After all, you seem to have a rather
similar news feed and footnotes is already slow on news
SpreadGNOME.org would be glad to work with FootNotes or anyone else in the
community to merge resources to accomplish more for GNOME.
SpreadGNOME.org really isn't intended to be simply a news source -- for
the content that is on there currently, it's primarily just notices of the
major
14 matches
Mail list logo
