Hi,
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 20:42:04 -0400
Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compare and contrast our notes with:
http://www.apple.com/getamac/
(ignore the videos, look at the text, what they are bragging about,
etc.) Luis
You're comparing apples with oranges.
Our release notes should
Hi,
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 02:08:09 +0200
karderio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What could take the edge off the buzz a user should be feeling when
reading about GNOME ? Compilation options is one, links to technical
fd.o standards another, there's the code cleanups section... Not to
say these
On 9/9/06, Andreas Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Luis!
Isn't Apples equivalent of our release notes more likely this?
http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/index.html
And yeah, they kick our asses in catchy copy-writing here too :)
That is more equivalent, but I guess I'm suggesting
Hi :o)
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 13:10 +0200, Claus Schwarm wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 02:08:09 +0200
karderio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What could take the edge off the buzz a user should be feeling when
reading about GNOME ? Compilation options is one, links to technical
fd.o
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 02:32 +0200, karderio wrote:
Hi :o)
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 00:33 +0100, Lee Tambiah wrote:
Please find version 0.1 (.svg format) for the Secondary Page Layout on
the LayoutPlanning page at:-
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/LayoutPlanning
Secondary Page
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 02:32 +0200, karderio wrote:
I certainly wouldn't put planet GNOME feeds on the front page. Users
either won't know what people are talking about, or be confused to the
point of suspecting the site to be compromised when they see a bloke
talking about his last holidays in
Hi,
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 15:22:15 +0200
karderio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps, but in any case we still need to cater for the lowest common
denominator : grandma :)
Well, as I said previously: Grandma's are never going to read our
release notes, unless their are interested in
Hi :o)
I really don't know how to argue this any better, it just seems to be
becoming silly.
I will simply restate that to effectively promote GNOME through our
website, things should be presented in a simple non technical way,
technical information being presented in separate sections for those
Hi guys,
I've just started Gnome 2.16 after 2 days of compiling. :) Looks great
but there's one thing that irritated me: The Epiphany home page is
http://www.google.com; per default.
Wouldn't it be better to set it to http://www.gnome.org/start/X.YY; for
every release? Another option could be to
--- Max Jonas Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
but there's one thing that irritated me: The
Epiphany home page is
http://www.google.com; per default.
Wouldn't it be better to set it to
http://www.gnome.org/start/X.YY; for
every release?
No, because that's release notes. As is being
--- Luca Cavalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 17:33 +0100, Joachim Noreiko
wrote:
Another option could be to create a
Gnome start page just
for the purpose of using it as home page in
Epiphany.
Hmmm... maybe.
But don't most distros overwrite that anyway?
Maybe an Epiphany specific what's new page might be more appropriate.
Although the start release page sounds good too.
Point is that if a user switches from a distro's default (say
Firefox), he'd want to see what this new browser his friend proposed,
has to offer.
Thats why I suggest something
On 9/9/06, Joachim Noreiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Luca Cavalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 17:33 +0100, Joachim Noreiko
wrote:
Another option could be to create a
Gnome start page just
for the purpose of using it as home page in
Epiphany.
Unfortunately I don't. I do have the business card of one of
the British linux magazines (Linux Format I think). I have tried
Wired before using their web form when I was doing GUADEC press
releases. But I did not get any response from them. I can try
again next cycle or perhaps try to set up
14 matches
Mail list logo
