gnome press resources

2006-09-18 Thread Santiago Roza
i'm listed in this contact page with my old email address; please update it with the current one ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): http://www.gnome.org/press/ thanks a lot, -- Santiago Roza [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://live.gnome.org/SantiagoRoza -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Quim Gil
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 21:18 -0600, Gezim Hoxha wrote: Why are the two links that should[?] point to the same thing? The Get Involved block came before the draft of a wgo primary nav bar with a Contribute link. This block is the weakest in the homepage right column and it might drop if the column

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Joachim Noreiko
--- LeeTambiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The breadcrumb component has been dropped, and pages have been updated have been updated. I have added a new version of the secondary page layoutPlanSecondaryPage0.3.svg. Download the .svg from http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/PageStructure. I still

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Gezim Hoxha
On Mon, 2006-18-09 at 09:57 +0200, Quim Gil wrote: On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 21:18 -0600, Gezim Hoxha wrote: On another note, if we look at the Webpersonas wikipage[1], we'll see that out of 5 personas, 3 have zero, 1 has low to medium, and 1 has medium free software awareness. Is the layout

wgo tagline?

2006-09-18 Thread Quim Gil
Recovering an old comment in the wiki about the need to have a tagline in the header of all the wgo pages. First of all, do we want this tagline? (we need to agree on this before starting another discussion about the GNOME tagline/slogan) :) The comment: The tag line is a means to communicate

Re: WGO Revamp: Look and Feel

2006-09-18 Thread Quim Gil
Going back to http://live.gnome.org/data/GnomeWeb(2f)LooknFeel/attachments/mizmo-wgo-mock-1.png I have extracted the purely lookfeel guidelines that can be deduced from this mockup, from this point Máirín can refine and make additions to be implemented in new mockups. See the updated

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread LeeTambiah
Joachim Noreiko wrote: --- LeeTambiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The breadcrumb component has been dropped, and pages have been updated have been updated. I have added a new version of the secondary page layoutPlanSecondaryPage0.3.svg. Download the .svg from

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

2006-09-18 Thread Quim Gil
Joachim, too many, heavy or impression are relative aspects that might vary substantially depending on the final look. In http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2006-September/msg00134.html there are examples of Apple, YouTube, Yahoo! and CNN working with 3 horizontal bars. The formula

Re: wgo 2.16.1 timeline

2006-09-18 Thread Quim Gil
wgo 2.16.1 task plan updated: http://live.gnome.org/data/GnomeWeb(2f)DevelopmentTimeline/attachments/2161wgorevamp.html CHANGELOG * Deadline for the CMS selection extended until October 17th (one month from now). If the selection process coordinated by Gergerly gets to a conclusion by then,

Layout Plan

2006-09-18 Thread LeeTambiah
The Secondary Page layout is now centre aligned on the page[1]. Should we apply the centre align to the home page also, at current it is left aligned. I think the home page should also be centre aligned like the Apple site[2]. [1]

Re: Layout Plan

2006-09-18 Thread Joachim Noreiko
--- LeeTambiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Secondary Page layout is now centre aligned on the page[1]. Should we apply the centre align to the home page also, at current it is left aligned. I think the home page should also be centre aligned like the Apple site[2]. I agree.

Re: Layout Plan

2006-09-18 Thread LeeTambiah
Joachim Noreiko wrote: --- LeeTambiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Secondary Page layout is now centre aligned on the page[1]. Should we apply the centre align to the home page also, at current it is left aligned. I think the home page should also be centre aligned like the Apple

layout Plan - feedback form

2006-09-18 Thread LeeTambiah
Claus Schwarm has requested an extra block for the second page being a link to feedback form. I personally feel this is unnecessary as the user can get information from the about section. Shall we go with this, drop it, or add as an optional component? Lee -- marketing-list mailing list