On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 19:04 +0200, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
1) I think certainly this must be integrated into the upcoming CMS.
This is the clear option when we have only one reseller. Having only two
already complicates a bit the process, but I guess is doable.
Another thing to be considered are
I would leave this up to the brand experts, but I have to disagree
with you here, Quim- as long as it is identifiably GNOME, people
should be encouraged to 'own' the brand and make it their own. If that
means customizing it for their country/team/whatever, great. The
universal, tightly controlled
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 08:56 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
I would leave this up to the brand experts, but I have to disagree
with you here, Quim- as long as it is identifiably GNOME, people
should be encouraged to 'own' the brand and make it their own. If that
means customizing it for their
We try to design new site for gnome.org.tr. I think may be gnome.org
want to use different design at now. I have a suggestion for
gnome.org :
http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/1953/gnometurkeytest1mu6bo4.jpg
What do you think about new design suggestion ?
--
marketing-list mailing list
Quim Gil wrote:
PS: reading twice Thilo's email I see he also agrees that using flags
for languages is a bad idea
I kind of think it depends on the language and the context surrounding
it, though. I think for a language like Japanese or say Irish Gaelic
where the language really is mostly
quote who=Máirín Duffy
So I guess in a nutshell I don't think we should dictate whether or not
flags must be used. I wouldn't completely ban them completely, however.
We (roughly) do in GNOME itself, due to all the political issues with flags.
The problem with having clear-cut cases and less
Hi,
Quim Gil wrote:
Killermundi will define the final price for each product and the cut
that would go to the GNOME Foundation.
It would be nice to negociate this and have a price in the contract,
rather than leave it up to their good will. This is what I have done in
my (failed) attempts in
