This looks good! I especially like how it's formulated. I guess the
paper should serve as an overview to others?
I have three suggestions for improvement (two my typical ones):
1.) Mention GNOME's different products.
At least, the desktop and dev platform should be mentioned. We might
also add
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 11:01 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Actually, the original idea I had about this is to do away with our
platform (eg the apps that make gnome.. after all the whole thing is a
distro decision these days anyways) Instead we would promote them via
adsense and drive
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Claus Schwarm clschw...@googlemail.comwrote:
Sorry if that sounds harsh, but that's just the way it is.
I can always depend on you to get to the heart of the matter, Claus. :-) I
don't think your comments are harsh, but does reflect a reality behind my
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 08:02 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
So maybe a modification is to create our own product page for each
promoted app with a link to the original page? I still think the
foundation of the ideas is sound which is to drive interest in
products that compete with others
Am Sonntag, den 14.06.2009, 20:11 +0200 schrieb Claus Schwarm:
Thus I also argued to have a
separate projects.gnome.org to manage project homepages more easily.
This has happened in the meantime.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Hi all,
We're working on the roadmap for GNOME 3.0 now. The idea is to have a
more concrete set of goals for 3.0 and bring more clarity and
transparency to the 3.0 general plans. Instead of doing a current
per-module roadmapping process, we're trying to use a more topic-based
approach. One of
Lucas, thanks for the email.
I had been taking a slightly different approach, but I think we can figure
it out.
For the BoF Stormy and I are giving at GUADEC, my hope had been to be able
to share out our plan with the community at that time based on discussions
on the list.
I sent the Brief out
Hi,
Paul Cutler wrote:
I can understand that. There's just no quantitative information I can find.
In general I don't think it's useful tp talk about market share of
desktop environments on Linux, given that overall market share of Linux
on the desktop is 1%.
I didn't comment on any of
I'd love to hear the community's thoughts on Lucas' email.
I would personally recommend for the objective:
To introduce existing GNOME users to GNOME 3.0, including it's features,
benefits and changes
Why existing? I think we need to be aware of scope, and our first mission
should be to help
