Agreed - that article was complete and utter sensationalistic garbage.
GNOME 3 doesn't seem to be failing on my desktop.
-Brett
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
We really need to push back on negative articles like this one:
Hello Sri, Brett,
Calling trash an article (doesn't matter if it is or isn't) will lead to
negative critics back to you.
Instead I propose to make each month (or every 2 or 3) a positive press
release about the future of gnome, what happened in the past month,
what decisions are made etc etc and
Instead I propose to make each month - Instead I propose YOU to make each
month :)
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:20 PM, alex diavatis alexis.diava...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Sri, Brett,
Calling trash an article (doesn't matter if it is or isn't) will lead to
negative critics back to you.
Instead
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 07:54:44PM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
seriously. What the hell.
It is just a troll. Probably to generate clicks or make the site name
known by hoping people link to it.
Not sure what to do. I suggest someone should get media training.
--
Regards,
Olav
--
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 07:54:44PM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
seriously. What the hell.
It is just a troll. Probably to generate clicks or make the site name
known by hoping people link to it.
Not sure what to do.
I've been seeing a lot of great articles coming from you guys on /r/gnome.
Great work guys! I really really appreciate all the content you guys are
generating on our behalf. Thanks for exposing our community and informing
them of the things we are doing in GNOME. Keep it up! You guys are an
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:01:20PM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 07:54:44PM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
seriously. What the hell.
It is just a troll. Probably to generate clicks or make
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:01:20PM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 07:54:44PM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
seriously.
- Mensaje original -
De: Juanjo Marín juanjomari...@yahoo.es
Para: Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me; GNOME Marketing List
marketing-list@gnome.org
CC:
Enviado: Domingo 19 de agosto de 2012 23:57
Asunto: Re: great job, world of gnome folks!
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Juanjo Marín juanjomari...@yahoo.eswrote:
In the Spanish Track in GUADEC (GUADEC-ES), Germán Póo-Caamaño gave a good
talk about how to deal with misinformation. He recommended the Debunking
Myths Handbook: http://sks.to/debunk
I think you meant to post this
Observations from a former participant who is now an outside observer:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
There are a lot of sites out there whose only intention is to cause
controversy. This article seems exactly about that. How to deal with
this: no clue,
De: Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me
Para: marketing-list@gnome.org
Enviado: Domingo 19 de agosto de 2012 23:59
Asunto: Re: push back on negative articles
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Larry Cafiero larry.cafi...@gmail.comwrote:
Observations from a former participant who is now an outside observer:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
There are a lot of sites out there whose only intention is to cause
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:02:17PM -0700, Larry Cafiero wrote:
Observations from a former participant who is now an outside observer:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
There are a lot of sites out there whose only intention is to cause
controversy. This
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:59:16PM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Is there some place to learn about media training? I don't know. I go
with my gut on some of this stuff and I haven't had any negative
consequences, but then I'm not dealing with the press, I'm dealing with
people in forums
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
I find this comparison over the top offence.
I urge you to read https://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct
He was quoting Bruce Byfield, so I don't think this applies since it's
not his opinion.
sri
--
marketing-list mailing
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:49:54PM -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
I find this comparison over the top offence.
I urge you to read https://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct
He was quoting Bruce Byfield, so I don't
I love that we're re-evaluating the ways that we handle press and that
we're looking for opportunities to improve.
I think we should focus on ways to get positive press, as others have
said, and I think one of the best ways to do that right now is probably to
talk about the 3.6 release. Maybe we
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Karen Sandler ka...@gnome.org wrote:
I love that we're re-evaluating the ways that we handle press and that
we're looking for opportunities to improve.
I can accept that. But I won't allow gross mis-characterizations to go
unchallenged. I can use my own plus
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
I didn't imply he was a troll. I've already stated he is a troll.
And by most people's definition of the word, you'd be wrong in calling
him that. Where's that Code of Conduct when you need it?
Again, I disagree. I would be
On 13 August 2012 11:56, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
At the Ubuntu Developer Summit in May, several of us that work with
GNOME in Ubuntu discussed the need for a Ubuntu community derivative
similar to Kubuntu, Xubuntu, and others but which will try to ship a
relatively pure GNOME
21 matches
Mail list logo
