Le mardi 06 décembre 2005 à 21:04 -0300, Santiago Roza a écrit :
cool... could you throw it in the wiki so we can build on it? i'd do
it myself, but i don't think i should appear as the original author
:)
The whole idea behind this little draft was to show that the often
requested data is
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 22:44 +0100, Marcus Bauer wrote:
there are three groups of desktop personas:
1. private
2. business
3. public sector
I'm going to make a quick comment about personas before people go too
far in this direction - if you follow Cooper (and I'm not exactly sure
how
Hi,
Alex Hudson wrote:
I would be happy to help contribute to some personas if people think
it's worth doing.
I think it is. Ideally, we could go into real depth on the personas and
how they might interact with GNOME (and also how GNOME doesn't suit
them), and do a smashing presentation of
if you follow Cooper (and I'm not exactly sure
how personas are supposed to apply to marketing), you're not trying to
define a target audience per se. What you're doing is actual
characterisation, as a novelist might do
then maybe we don't have to follow cooper strictly, because we might
end
Hi,
Santiago Roza wrote:
if you follow Cooper (and I'm not exactly sure
how personas are supposed to apply to marketing), you're not trying to
define a target audience per se. What you're doing is actual
characterisation, as a novelist might do
then maybe we don't have to follow cooper
En/na Santiago Roza ha escrit:
if it could be shown at guadec or something like that
If the show is interesting why not. We can't compromise to put it on
schedule now of course, but there will be a possibility to present a
paper, or be invited directly if the GUADEC committee thinks your work
% I disagree. What you're doing is creating living, breathing characters
which represent your target audiences.
yeah, and i agree with this of course. what i don't like is the idea
of creating living characters, at the cost of making them A LOT less
representative of your target audience.
for
Alex Hudson wrote:
[It's also valid to argue that personas are not a useful tool; many
people hold that viewpoint. I don't, personally, but there are
significant limitations to how you can use it IMHO]
There's a huge difference between personas are not a useful tool and
personas are not a
Usability and
marketing are totally different things, and of course you're going to
need different tools for them.
err... no. usability has everything to do with users' needs and
expectations, and that has everything to do with marketing.
but usability and advertising are totally different
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 11:25 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
at least from a marketing point of view, you can't ask me to forget
trying to cover my userbase... that's suicidal; we'd be telling
anecdotes, not segmenting anything.
You're still missing the point, I think.
The general idea is to cover
[snip]
You can't make everyone happy all the time; personas is just a tool to
help figure out how to prioritise who to make happy when, if you see
what I mean.
And a way for developers to remember that they should worry about the
_goals_ of real people.
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you think of a bell population, you have
80% within two standard deviations (I think?).
yeah 80% is good; what i don't want is personas who're so individual
and pretty and unique :) that they don't reflect the userbase at all.
--
Santiago Roza
Departamento I+D - Thymbra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le mardi 06 décembre 2005 à 18:08 +0100, Dave Neary a écrit :
Hi,
Murray Cumming wrote:
I think both our development and marketing would be helped (to have
organisational focus) by having Personas. A university was working on them
a couple of years ago, but that effort seems to have
cool... could you throw it in the wiki so we can build on it? i'd do
it myself, but i don't think i should appear as the original author
:)
--
Santiago Roza
Departamento I+D - Thymbra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
