On 14 Feb 2007, at 16:02, Joachim wrote:
On 2/13/07, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 11:59 +, Joachim wrote:
But for this to happen, we need the HIG to be updated, and for
that to
happen I think we need library.g.o up and running.
snip
Anyway, I really
Hi,
2007/2/11, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry for missing this email with this interesting organigram.
No problems... ;-)
Your proposal is totally code-centric, considering GNOME only code and
circunven ti it to the Release Team. It's a perspective and probably
nobody can tell you it's
2007/2/12, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some examples of things that should be
indispensable, but are not:
* usability designers (not post-implementation usability testers)
should be indispensable to every screen of UI we write
* accessibility hackers should be indispensable to every widget
On 2/11/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, while GNOME is Code the community is realizing that GNOME is
People (yes, that meme) as well. I would draw perhaps a bi-polar
structure with the release team developers in one side, and the
board membership of the GNOME Foundation in
On 2/13/07, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 11:59 +, Joachim wrote:
But for this to happen, we need the HIG to be updated, and for that to
happen I think we need library.g.o up and running.
snip
Anyway, I really do intend to start working on the HIG again
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 11:59 +, Joachim wrote:
But for this to happen, we need the HIG to be updated, and for that to
happen I think we need library.g.o up and running.
Well, not necessarily, I'd only expect the 'stable' version of the HIG
to be hosted on library.gnome.org anyway (or has
On 2/11/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for missing this email with this interesting organigram.
Your proposal is totally code-centric, considering GNOME only code and
circunven ti it to the Release Team. It's a perspective and probably
nobody can tell you it's wrong.
However,
On 2/11/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for missing this email with this interesting organigram.
Your proposal is totally code-centric, considering GNOME only code and
circunven ti it to the Release Team. It's a perspective and probably
nobody can tell you it's wrong.
The
Mmm but wait, at least my GNOME experience as contributor is not
dependant to the code in the repositories and the release team, as the
diagram shows.
At least board, marketing team, web team and GUADEC (or GNOME events
in general) will also run and keep running no matter which decisions
relating
On 2/12/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mmm but wait, at least my GNOME experience as contributor is not
dependant to the code in the repositories and the release team, as the
diagram shows.
At least board, marketing team, web team and GUADEC (or GNOME events
in general) will also run
Sorry for missing this email with this interesting organigram.
Your proposal is totally code-centric, considering GNOME only code and
circunven ti it to the Release Team. It's a perspective and probably
nobody can tell you it's wrong.
However, while GNOME is Code the community is realizing that
Hi all,
My name is Vicente, I'm a MsC candidate in Administration at Federal
University of Bahia (Brazil) and I try to help the brazilian l10n team
by commiting translations too.
I've been working in a research about the GNOME Project with Lucas
Rocha [1] . However, while he has been aproaching
12 matches
Mail list logo
