Richard Hoelscher a écrit :
Long story short, for the purpose of front-page use, I'm all in favor of
GNOME being described as open source software, not Open Source,
Free Software or Open-Source Free Software. Use it as an adjective
to get the point across that this is a community of good
rajiv vyas wrote:
Instead of emails and abiword files going back and forth, should we move
text editing to www.writely.com? I can invite the group or individual
members? Of course, if it does not work or people find it inconvenient,
we can move back to the old email/abiword way.
Thanks,
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
GNOME is an Open-Source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source Operating
System http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_System built to be stable...
I think some people would not agree that GNOME is an Operating System.
GNU/Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris are operating
On 9/13/05, Andreas Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugh Buzacott wrote:
I am still pushing for a new GNOME.org so I created a mock-up.
The mock-up is at http://www.geocities.com/bzctt/ and is only a front
page but has links to the rest of normal GNOME.org through the header.
It is
I am still pushing for a new GNOME.org so I created a
mock-up.
The mock-up is at http://www.geocities.com/bzctt/
and is only a front page but has links to the rest of normal GNOME.org through
the header.
It is just a suggestion so if you have any ideas and so forth
just send them.
Hugh Buzacott wrote:
I am still pushing for a new GNOME.org so I created a mock-up.
Oh Goody...
The mock-up is at http://www.geocities.com/bzctt/ and is only a front
page but has links to the rest of normal GNOME.org through the header.
It is just a suggestion so if you have any ideas and
