On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 22:12 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
Most of the stuff at the end of this list is outlying stuff that does
not belong in any overview.
and that's why i put that in the end and labeled it not so common
and/or relevant :)
To encourage people to read it, just remove it,
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 02:28 -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
It's done: I've read [almost] every single comment from the 2.12
release articles (including Slashdot and OSNews, which Travis was
going to cover... sorry Travis, I got carried away), and here's the
compiled list of
I don't think this is of much value to the developers. They do tend to
read web site comments when we do major releases, so reiterating the
comments doesn't help them much.
i don't know which developers do read this stuff and which ones don't,
so this list was supposed to be a summary of all
Great work! I read a lot of the comments as well. You might
consider adding Number of libraries/dependencies also. This is a
common complaint at work and we are finally addressing that I think.
sri
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:28:12AM -0300, Santiago Roza wrote:
It's done: I've read [almost]
It's done: I've read [almost] every single comment from the 2.12
release articles (including Slashdot and OSNews, which Travis was
going to cover... sorry Travis, I got carried away), and here's the
compiled list of complaints/suggestions/etc.
I guess someone (who has actual contact with them,
Hi,
I haven't been doing any filtering. I think we can probably rely on
tuxmag to come through for us in a few weeks :)
Cheers,
Dave.
Luis Villa wrote:
It would be a good idea for someone to find and categorize all the
negative reviews too, so that we can address those issues (either by
On 9/10/05, David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been doing any filtering. I think we can probably rely on
tuxmag to come through for us in a few weeks :)
Someone could filter them then :) And I'm sure we have others besides
tuxmag- meaty slashdot comments etc., etc. This is the
what I've been reading a lot (I don't have any links though) is that the following things have to be improved:
-footprint
-gnomevfs to be adopted by all apps or die, I mean or link vfs's to the real filesystem somehow
and the biggest issue for me, I dunno if it was fixed in 2.12,
but I have
btw, with footprint I mean memory footprint2005/9/10, Javier Aravena [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
what I've been reading a lot (I don't have any links though) is that the following things have to be improved:
-footprint
-gnomevfs to be adopted by all apps or die, I mean or link vfs's to the real filesystem
Luis Villa wrote:
It would be a good idea for someone to find and categorize all the
negative reviews too, so that we can address those issues (either by
fixing problems or educating reviewers) during the next release cycle.
Any volunteers? :)
Luis
Some more.
A. Slashdot article GNOME
10 matches
Mail list logo
