Hi,
Could we get gnome.org/news syndicated to news.gnome.org straight away,
please? Regardless of other changes we might make, I think this is a
good idea.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
GNOME Foundation member
dne...@gnome.org
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:46:32AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Could we get gnome.org/news syndicated to news.gnome.org straight away,
please? Regardless of other changes we might make, I think this is a
good idea.
Just add the feed to planet-web module.
--
Regards,
Olav
--
marketing-list
The feed seems to be broken, no news on it:
http://www.gnome.org/news/feed/
2011/6/22 Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:46:32AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Could we get gnome.org/news syndicated to news.gnome.org straight away,
please? Regardless of other changes we might
Hi,
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:38:31AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Weird. The feed title is Comments on: News in Google Reader.
http://www.gnome.org/feed/ ?
I guess that works too. Only contains 5 items (compared to 10 on
/category/news)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
GNOME
I think this is a problem that will have to be solved with all the distros
in a room. Unless we come up with a solution that is so elegant end-users
just use it.
Saying we shouldn't do an installer because each distro is different, is
ignoring a user problem. apt-get and yum are beyond the
2009/6/19 Stormy Peters sto...@gnome.org:
I think this is a problem that will have to be solved with all the distros
in a room. Unless we come up with a solution that is so elegant end-users
just use it.
Saying we shouldn't do an installer because each distro is different, is
ignoring a user
Not to promote, but Linux Plumbers Conference is exactly about solving this
kind of stuff. If someone was willing to write a paper about PackageKit or
something like that would be really good so that we can highlight this
problem. Then we can work on it together to move Linux forward. Does that
Am Dienstag, den 16.06.2009, 12:15 -0500 schrieb Brian Cameron:
We work hard to get our patches upstream,
but there is usually a lag time and some modules are not well maintained
(we have patches in bugzilla for modules like libgnome and gnome-vfs
that have sat idle for years).
Probably
On 06/16/2009 11:46 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Stormy Peters wrote:
I think we need an installer - for Linux and for Windows.
And I think there's interest from several distributions to have an
application install solution so if we were willing to create one (or
a plan for one), I think we
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 21:54 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
I think we need an installer - for Linux and for Windows.
And I think there's interest from several distributions to have an
application install solution so if we were willing to create one (or a
plan for one), I think we might be able
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 12:26 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
In some cases, you can even include just a link that people can click.
You can install, say, Transmission in Ubuntu from the browser using a
link pointing to apt:transmission, and in OpenSUSE you can use the
one
click installer-thing
Dave:
I am against any Linux ISD (including ourselves) trying to provide a
one-size-fits-all installer, until a packaging system that allows that
comes along. I have high hopes for PackageKit, but in the meantime, your
goal should not be to give people installers, but to document installing
On 16 Jun 2009, at 11:26, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
In some cases, you can even include just a link that people can click.
You can install, say, Transmission in Ubuntu from the browser using
a link pointing to apt:transmission, and in OpenSUSE you can use
the one click installer-thing
I think we need an installer - for Linux and for Windows.
And I think there's interest from several distributions to have an
application install solution so if we were willing to create one (or a plan
for one), I think we might be able to find resources to put behind it.
Stormy
On Sun, Jun 14,
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 11:01 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Actually, the original idea I had about this is to do away with our
platform (eg the apps that make gnome.. after all the whole thing is a
distro decision these days anyways) Instead we would promote them via
adsense and drive
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Claus Schwarm clschw...@googlemail.comwrote:
Sorry if that sounds harsh, but that's just the way it is.
I can always depend on you to get to the heart of the matter, Claus. :-) I
don't think your comments are harsh, but does reflect a reality behind my
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 08:02 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
So maybe a modification is to create our own product page for each
promoted app with a link to the original page? I still think the
foundation of the ideas is sound which is to drive interest in
products that compete with others
Am Sonntag, den 14.06.2009, 20:11 +0200 schrieb Claus Schwarm:
Thus I also argued to have a
separate projects.gnome.org to manage project homepages more easily.
This has happened in the meantime.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Got a bit inspired by:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-June/msg00012.html
news.gnome.org got some really nice project blogs, so lets add some more!
A couple of nice feeds I can think of from the top of my head:
* Banshee - http://banshee-project.org/blog/
* Inkscape - http
Here are some apps I personally find cool, with my personal comments below.
I apologize, I don't have time to see if they have feeds while I'm at this
docs conference. I did check the news.gnome.org feed, and didn't see them.
Maybe they can be convinced to start one. :)
* Brasero (just added
, this looks like a nice idea, Andreas. (and why not
Rhythmbox..)
sri
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Andreas Nilsson nisses.m...@home.sewrote:
Got a bit inspired by:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-June/msg00012.html
news.gnome.org got some really nice project blogs, so lets add
On 06/13/2009 08:01 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Actually, the original idea I had about this is to do away with our
platform (eg the apps that make gnome.. after all the whole thing is a
distro decision these days anyways) Instead we would promote them via
adsense and drive traffic to these
Suggestion regarding the news.gnome.org planetplanet. It would be nice
if all board announcements could be posted on some blogs.gnome.org
special thingy (like e.g. metacity on news.gnome.org). This could then
be aggregated on news.gnome.org. This for all the announcements that are
currently done
Le lundi 13 octobre 2008, à 18:13 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
Suggestion regarding the news.gnome.org planetplanet. It would be nice
if all board announcements could be posted on some blogs.gnome.org
special thingy (like e.g. metacity on news.gnome.org). This could then
be aggregated
Hi,
was it intended to title:
http://news.gnome.org/
as Planet GNOME? I think that this can confuse people if that was
intendended. I also would recommend to:
* Link to http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/ or to streamline with that
* Link to http://gnomejournal.org/
maybe both on a side bar
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:41:24PM +0200, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
was it intended to title:
http://news.gnome.org/
as Planet GNOME? I think that this can confuse people if that was
intendended. I also would recommend to:
No, that is what the theme for pgo/news already looked like. It should
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 02:24:35PM +0200, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
Another point I like to discuss is - and that relates to the sorts of
My suggestion would be to also migrate www.gnome.org/press/releases/ to
a blog (but rather to news.gnome.org/pressreleases or so) ASAP as a
first step. AFAIK
to get news out. (Not to mention that the whole reason
news.gnome.org is now a planet-like aggregator is because we suck at
creating our own news feeds.)
So I think news.gnome.org should work more on
content it owns and can choose the license it wishes. The current site
states that the content
GNOME News (like the http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/ )
This is not a simple question, but nonetheless an important one.
My suggestion would be to also migrate www.gnome.org/press/releases/ to
a blog (but rather to news.gnome.org/pressreleases or so) ASAP as a
first step. AFAIK news.gnome.org
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 10:56:48AM -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
2008/10/5 Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
news.gnome.org in above stuff is nothing different than any of the other
planets. The copyrighted by GNOME might make it confusing, but that is
something for some legal person to guide
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 10:56:48AM -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
2008/10/5 Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
news.gnome.org in above stuff is nothing different than any of the other
planets. The copyrighted by GNOME might make
Le dimanche 14 septembre 2008, à 13:10 -0600, Stormy Peters a écrit :
I like the idea of pointing to a planet.gnome.org/news.
Who updates the news in the left hand column of gnome.org?
They are manually added when someone requests something to be added
there. (that's bad -- something the new
bar will link to news.gnome.org and this subsite will be based in the
current http://planet.gnome.org/news/
This is the original plan at
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewsGateway . We need to update it
considering the News related http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/UseCases and
go for it.
We still
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 23:11 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
Would it be debatable to solve the many issues we have around GNOME +
news in a general plan with a main objective: a one and only
news.gnome.org?
Problem is the we need to cater to the news source. Many people like to
blog their news, many
Would it be debatable to solve the many issues we have around GNOME +
news in a general plan with a main objective: a one and only
news.gnome.org?
This is one of the items in the revamped General navigation bar. It's ok
to have the Footnotes as they are now there, but we can work on
something
Quim Gil wrote:
Should we have a separate news channel? Should those news be simply the
latest relevant entries at gnomedesktop.org? Should they be the latest
posts to gnome-announce-list? An edited combination of all the sources?
No idea, this is a discussion related with a couple of 2.16
Quim Gil wrote:
Should we have a separate news channel? Should those news be simply the
latest relevant entries at gnomedesktop.org? Should they be the latest
posts to gnome-announce-list? An edited combination of all the sources?
No idea, this is a discussion related with a couple of 2.16
Gergely Nagy:
Spinning off a
news.gnome.org _just_ because it may be served by a different CMS is
IMHO not the way to go.
It was not like that and I was just prospecting possibilities. A
news.gnome.org is in the potential goals (in fact http://news.gnome.org/
already exists and is the same
38 matches
Mail list logo
