On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 16:56 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 18:28 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
Well done. This is great stuff, and obviously a lot of work.
1. The first page
(http://www.gnome.org/start/2.14/notes/C/index.html)
has a link at the end to the release
Le samedi 11 mars 2006 à 10:08 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Hi,
Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
Hi,
Op Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:23:56 -0800, schreef Bob Kashani:
Should we update them?
We probably should.
(...)
I couldn't help but notice that the screenshot on the main page has a
Firefox icon on the toolbar, and that the screenshot of the Preferred
Applications capplet shows Firefox to be
Hi,
Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
The latest committed version is online at:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 18:28 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
Well done. This is great stuff, and obviously a lot of work.
1. The first page
(http://www.gnome.org/start/2.14/notes/C/index.html)
has a link at the end to the release notes
(http://www.gnome.org/start/2.12/notes/)
Even with the
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 10:08 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 14:23 -0800, Bob Kashani wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 10:08 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 03:03:30PM -0800, Bob Kashani wrote:
We probably should. I have a screenshot of the sound pref. without the
default sound card entry. But I'm not all that great with using gimp to
remove the little black bits from the top corners. I'll upload it and
hopeful Davyd
On 3/9/06, Rajiv Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/9/06, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
- Does anyone want to take charge on writing a press release? I am
willing to raise my hand again if so required.
Did
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
The latest committed version is online at:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:05 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
The latest
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 12:32 -0800, Bob Kashani wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:05 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:40 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 12:32 -0800, Bob Kashani wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:05 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the
Hi,
I didn't mention any specific country, nor the whole world I just
said for which no legal plugins are available. which seemed to be
the most neutral way of putting it.\
I could go on very long about the quality/benifits of licensed and
unlicensed codecs, but I think the strong point here
On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 13:44 +, Edward Hervey wrote:
I could go on very long about the quality/benifits of licensed and
unlicensed codecs, but I think the strong point here is that it
*allows* both for everybody's benefits (nothing *forces* you to
download/use them AFAIK).
Given the goal
Hi Alan :)
On 3/7/06, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 13:44 +, Edward Hervey wrote:
I could go on very long about the quality/benifits of licensed and
unlicensed codecs, but I think the strong point here is that it
*allows* both for everybody's benefits
El lun, 06-03-2006 a las 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley escribió:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
Hi Davyd
I found this little typo: independant instead of independent
Hey David,
overall, very nice job, as always :-)
Just a couple of comments :
* Regarding the speed improvements of the gnome log viewer, it could
be good to specify that the launch times mentioned in the article are
when loading a 2.9MB log file. Otherwise, it makes the log viewer
looks pretty bad
Thomas Vander Stichele writes:
However, not everyone in the GNOME community necessarily agrees with
this. I got *a lot* of requests to add an mp3 recording profile to
gnome-media. Historically, I've always refuted these requests because I
agree that GNOME should not be endorsing them.
I
On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 16:37 +, Alan Cox wrote:
plugins are not available. The GNOME 2.14 distribution does not itself
contain these non-free components.
Actually better yet
contain or endorse
Alan
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
Hi again,
On 3/7/06, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 14:50 +, Edward Hervey wrote:
Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
offer support for licensed codecs for
On 2006-03-07T11:34:25+0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GStreamer 0.10 will also allow users to take advantage of multimedia
plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to offer support for licensed
codecs for which no legal plugins are available. These may include
support for AC3, WMA, MP3 and
On 3/6/06, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
I guess I found one:
release-notes.xml:42
(...) To learn more about GNOME and
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 14:28 -0600, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
On 3/6/06, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
In the very
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 08:31 -0400, Pedro de Medeiros wrote:
On 3/6/06, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
I guess I
Hi,
two suggestion if I'm not too late already:
1.) The first sentence is too long: Please stop it after platforms
otherwise people with low attention will stop reading right there.
2.) includes sounds strange. Why not just remove it?
The paragraph then reads:
GNOME 2.14 is the
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 23:30 +0100, Claus Schwarm wrote:
Hi,
two suggestion if I'm not too late already:
1.) The first sentence is too long: Please stop it after platforms
otherwise people with low attention will stop reading right there.
2.) includes sounds strange. Why not just
On 3/9/06, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
- Does anyone want to take charge on writing a press release? I am
willing to raise my hand again if so required.
Did anyone start working on it? Any volunteer from the
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
The latest committed version is online at:
Hi Bob,
Yesterday at 23:41, Bob Kashani wrote:
I like this much better. It flows much nicer too. I made the changes.
Also note that if you want translated release notes, you'll have to be
much more strict about such changes at this time.
We are only 5 days from a release, and there are only
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27:32AM +0100, Danilo ??egan wrote:
With Gnome 2.12 we were very successful with translation (24
languages!), but notes were finished two weeks before the release,
and stabilised at least a week before release. I think it looked
really cool on
This is basically my
On 3/9/06, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27:32AM +0100, Danilo ??egan wrote:
With Gnome 2.12 we were very successful with translation (24
languages!), but notes were finished two weeks before the release,
and stabilised at least a week before release. I
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 07:35 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27:32AM +0100, Danilo ??egan wrote:
With Gnome 2.12 we were very successful with translation (24
languages!), but notes were finished two weeks before the release,
and stabilised at least a week before
Today at 0:54, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 3/9/06, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:27:32AM +0100, Danilo ??egan wrote:
With Gnome 2.12 we were very successful with translation (24
languages!), but notes were finished two weeks before the release,
and
Today at 1:37, Bob Kashani wrote:
I am going to let Bob and Claus finish up with the editing, but I
will understand if at GUADEC, any translators want to come up and
punch me in the face.
Not really, if we can negotiate a truce. See below. ;)
In general I think that you've done a really
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 07:29:23 +0100
Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Consider linking to http://gnome.org/projects/ instead of
gnomefiles.org so we keep users in our website and we prioritise the
official GNOME projects. You could add then something like You may find
more GNOME related
Edward Hervey wrote:
revised version 0.3.a-beta-pre25-coma-7:
Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
offer support for licensed codecs for which no legal plugins are
available.
Does that make
On 3/7/06, James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward Hervey wrote:
revised version 0.3.a-beta-pre25-coma-7:
Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
offer support for licensed codecs
Hi,
plugins are not available. The GNOME 2.14 distribution does not itself
contain these non-free components.
Actually better yet
contain or endorse
I'd be completely fine with this standpoint.
However, not everyone in the GNOME community necessarily agrees with
this. I got *a lot*
Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
technical correctness.
The latest committed version is online at:
http://www.gnome.org/start/2.14/notes/C/index.html
You can also check out the release
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 23:57 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Addendum:
- If anyone knows the status of the LiveCD, that section requires
updating.
As I wrote the other day I ordered a new computer but it hasn't yet
arrived. Thus I'll clear up some space on my laptop and start producing
the liveCD
Oops. Forgot to CC lists.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Neat job.
In front page:
free software = Free Software
Users - Performance:
font rendering = text rendering (we did not optimizing the
actual drawing at all, just the text layout...)
the entire dictionary = an
Murray,
I've attempted to merge in your suggestions. Tell me what you think.
--d
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 18:28 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
Well done. This is great stuff, and obviously a lot of work.
1. The first page
(http://www.gnome.org/start/2.14/notes/C/index.html)
has a link at the
Sorry, forgot to say:
- Add a very visible link to http://art.gnome.org/screenshots/gnome214
in the first paragraph.
En/na Quim Gil ha escrit:
Davyd, this is pretty cool.
--
Quim Gil - http://desdeamericaconamor.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
marketing-list
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 14:39 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
Murray,
I've attempted to merge in your suggestions. Tell me what you think.
Thanks.
9.
In the developers section:
guarentee - guarantee
Still needs doing.
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
En/na Davyd Madeley ha escrit:
Journalist ready press bytes are meant to be handled by the press
release. As far as I know, no one has put their hand up for this yet.
If you look at http://gnome.org/start/2.12/ you will see that the
release notes are, in fact, our primary document to explain
46 matches
Mail list logo
