I'm not really sure about the effectiveness of this approach. I think
addressing these external problems in such a micro level - as in, answering
comments and pieces of news - is very likely to create more noise and,
possibly, more misunderstanding about the project.
What I think might be a
Sri, essentially you're talking about setting up a dedicated GNOME
channel on IRC for this sort of stuff, is that right? One anyone could
subscribe to and get updates when they are posted. If we do so (and
I'm not opposed to) we need to ensure we have fresh content, else
it'll become yet another
Maybe it would be simpler to just do a Google+ Hangout?
--lucasr
On 15 November 2012 06:34, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Karen Sandler ka...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, November 14, 2012 7:58 am, alex diavatis wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at
Hi Dave,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
I think that as a project, we have had trouble communicating our vision,
because as a project we are not sure what it is. There is a part of the
project that has a very clear idea of their vision, but that vision
I think Dave's point was that we missed an opportunity to keep
Cinnamon as GNOME 3 - because at one point it was GNOME 3.x with
extensions piled on. They have since forked and are truly a separate
project now, but that wasn't always the case. If we had made it clear
that they their users were
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Emily Gonyer emilyyr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Dave's point was that we missed an opportunity to keep
Cinnamon as GNOME 3 - because at one point it was GNOME 3.x with
extensions piled on. They have since forked and are truly a separate
Well, the thing is
