I have thought long about this initiative. I would not generally
consider this a bad thing, but:
a) I do not like that this was not discussed at all in the marketing
list. Such major things and announcement have to be discussed with at
least the marketing team
b) I fear that this is in fact a
Hi,
On 4/21/07, Thilo Pfennig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a) I do not like that this was not discussed at all in the marketing
list. Such major things and announcement have to be discussed with at
least the marketing team
As discussed in foundation-list, it was an initiative that needed
certain
On 4/21/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No relation between the people working on the wgo revamp andthe
organizations supporting the launch of GMAE. Or do you see a link?
Please explain.
Perhaps Thilo means that there should have been.
GMAE changes the scope of GNOME quite
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 03:19:48PM +0200, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
I have thought long about this initiative. I would not generally
consider this a bad thing, but:
a) I do not like that this was not discussed at all in the marketing
list. Such major things and announcement have to be discussed
quote who=Thilo Pfennig
a) I do not like that this was not discussed at all in the marketing list.
Such major things and announcement have to be discussed with at least the
marketing team
I think the reality is that not everything will be discussed here. We can
argue about that, or rock on